Pa. same-sex couples get marriage licenses
NORRISTOWN — At least five same-sex couples obtained marriage licenses Wednesday in a suburban Philadelphia county that is defying a state ban on such unions.
Alicia Terrizzi and Loreen Bloodgood, both of Pottstown, were the only couple to marry right away, exchanging vows in a park before a minister and their two young sons.
“We're not setting out to be pioneers. We don't think our family is any different than anybody else,” said Terrizzi, a 45-year-old teacher. “We've been waiting a long time for this.”
The licenses issued in Montgomery County are believed to be the first to same-sex couples in Pennsylvania, the only northeastern state without same-sex marriages or civil unions.
A 1996 Pennsylvania law defines marriage as a civil contract in which a man and a woman take each other as husband and wife, and it says same-sex marriages, even ones entered legally elsewhere, are void in Pennsylvania.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania filed a lawsuit this month seeking to overturn the law.
Officials in the affluent and increasingly Democratic county signaled this week that they nevertheless would grant licenses to same-sex couples.
The county officials and the same-sex couples who marry could find themselves in court if Republican Gov. Tom Corbett or other state officials challenge their actions.
In other states with same-sex marriage bans, licenses issued by defiant local officials have been voided by courts.
“Today I feel like a full citizen,” said Marcus Saitschenko, 52, of Philadelphia, who came to the suburban courthouse with his partner of 22 years, James Goldstein. “We're just hoping that the state will recognize it.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- FCC clears technology use to block robocalls
- Administration finalizes, defends broader regulations under Clean Water Act
- Dems tell DHS to end family detention
- Army lab sent at least 1 live batch of anthrax
- Patriot Act deal looks unlikely
- Obama gets state, local allies for key initiatives
- Phone threats put scare into international flights
- Cleveland settles policing issues with Justice Department
- More rain worsens flooding in Texas
- Energy drilling boom reversed by plunge in prices
- Ex-coal boss Blankenship wants July trial delayed to January