O.J. makes pitch for parole in '07 robbery
By The Associated Press
Published: Thursday, July 25, 2013, 5:21 p.m.
CARSON CITY, Nev. — O.J. Simpson went before a parole board and pleaded for leniency on his armed robbery and kidnapping sentence Thursday as he expressed regret for his actions and described himself as an upstanding inmate who earns pennies an hour keeping gym equipment sanitized and umpiring and coaching games in the prison yard.
Simpson said he has become a counselor of sorts to fellow inmates doing time for similar crimes and noted that he has made amends with his victims in a botched 2007 heist of memorabilia in a hotel room in Las Vegas.
“I just wish I never went to that room,” the 66-year-old Simpson said during a 15-minute appearance.
Parole officials did not immediately rule on his request, which Simpson made remotely from a video conference room in Lovelock Correction Center. But their decision will have little impact on his overall sentence because he is eligible for parole on only one of his consecutive sentences. As a result, even if the Nevada Parole Board rules in his favor, he then would begin serving sentences attached to other charges and spend at least another four years in prison.
His best chance for freedom lies with a pending decision by a Las Vegas judge on whether to grant him a new trial based on claims that his trial lawyer botched his defense and had a conflict of interest in the case. Clark County District Judge Linda Marie Bell held a weeklong hearing in May on the issue that featured testimony from Simpson.
At the parole hearing, Simpson provided a glimpse of his time in prison since he was sentenced to nine to 33 years behind bars. He said he has given counsel to other inmates who come to him with their issues. But he said he shouldn't be compared with other inmates.
“The difference between all of their crimes and mine is, they were trying to steal other people's property,” he said. “They were trying to steal other people's money.
“My crime was trying to retrieve for my family my own property,” he said, mentioning how he has missed his children, graduations and his sister's funeral. “Make no mistake, I would give it all back to these guys. They can have it all to get these five years of my life back.”
He told the two-member parole panel that he has spoken at length with Alfred Beardsley and Bruce Fromong — the two dealers targeted in the holdup. He acknowledged that he was “not as civil as I should have been” while trying to regain the property.
“I knew both of these guys who had my stuff,” Simpson said. “I am sorry for what has happened. ... I've apologized. They've apologized.”
He was the only person to speak on his behalf. No victims spoke.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Spyware in government computers ‘has Russian paw prints all over it’
- Accuser takes stand during court-martial
- ‘Holy grail of guitars’ for sale in April auction
- Nearly 23 years later, man convicted of 9 slayings in robbery
- Opposition to NSA surveillance unites liberals, Tea Party followers
- Traffic cameras rejected in Ohio ruling
- Death penalty under fire in Fla.
- Shutdown cost national parks at least $414M
- Panel’s IRS probe could stall, GOP chairman says
- ‘Senior officers should not do that,’ Army leader says in pleading guilty to misconduct charges
- Senator wants fast action on rail safety