Allegations against mayor the talk of San Diego
SAN DIEGO — The news release intended to project an air of normalcy: “Forward with City Business!” exclaimed the announcement Mayor Bob Filner put out last week with some upbeat photos showing the mayor reviewing plans for a library and smiling at a gay pride parade.
But “normal” San Diego is not these days — not with talk of unwanted advances, headlocks and comparisons of Filner to Anthony Weiner. The lurid claims against the 70-year-old have become the talk of the town — plunging California's second-largest city into political turmoil amid demands for its first Democratic leader in decades to resign.
“I can't go anywhere without it coming up — the Laundromat, the grocery store, a friend's party, a restaurant,” said Todd Gloria, a Democrat who, as City Council president, would become interim mayor if Filner resigns. “No one is supportive of the mayor.”
Filner shows no sign of quitting, fueling talk of a recall effort less than eight months into his four-year term. His office didn't respond to an interview request.
The San Diego County Democratic Party Central Committee was to meet Thursday evening to reconsider its position on Filner. At a three-hour meeting last week, the party split on whether to call for his resignation, but that was before three women came forward with detailed allegations of mistreatment.
Stephen Whitburn, a spokesman for the county Democratic Party, said he expected the meeting on Thursday to be much shorter than last week's but wouldn't say why.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nurse defies Maine quarantine in standoff over Ebola
- Unaccompanied immigrants put heavy strain on schools, charities
- Few knew of cyber attack on White House computer network
- Ebola virus could overwhelm health care system, AP finds
- Botched probe of suspected arms dealer echoed Fast and Furious, watchdog finds
- Wash. shooting survivor has jaw surgery
- Democratic areas flush with transportation grants
- D.C. closer to legalizing sale of pot
- Museum saves part of bomber plant
- Gray wolf sighting reported at Grand Canyon
- Ferguson grand jury cleared in leaks about police shooting of black teenager