Share This Page

Ohio abductor pleads guilty, to get life in prison plus 1,000 years

| Friday, July 26, 2013, 8:46 p.m.
Ariel Castro enters the courtroom Friday, July 26, 2013, in Cleveland. Castro, who imprisoned three women in his home, subjecting them to a decade of rapes and beatings, pleaded guilty to 937 counts in a deal to avoid the death penalty. In exchange, prosecutors recommended Castro be sentenced to life without parole plus 1,000 years.

Ariel Castro, the Cleveland bus driver who repeatedly sexually abused three women he held prisoner for about a decade, said he knew his life was over when he first spoke to authorities after his arrest in May. On Friday, Castro formally pleaded guilty to more than 900 counts of criminal behavior and accepted a plea deal that will keep him in prison for the rest of his life — but will spare him from the death penalty.

Castro firmly answered a barrage of questions from Judge Michael J. Russo seeking to ensure that the 53-year-old knew what was coming.

Unlike previous appearances in court, Castro this time appeared engaged, looking up at the judge rather than down at the floor and speaking clearly. He wore glasses for the first time and said he was able to see his surroundings.

The result was inevitable, Castro told the court. He said he knew after his arrest that he was “going to get the book thrown at me.”

“I knew that when I first spoke to the FBI agent when I first got arrested,” he said later.

Assured by the defendant that he understood he was admitting to hundreds of horrendous acts and acknowledging that he understood his life will end behind bars, Russo formally accepted Castro's guilty plea and set sentencing for Thursday.

The recommended sentence as part of the plea agreement is life in prison without parole plus 1,000 years, a formula designed to make sure Castro is never freed.

After the news broke that the three women had managed to escape from Castro's house in a poor section of Cleveland, the city and the nation were shocked by the degree and duration of their captivity. Many sought to understand how the imprisonment could have gone on and why it began.

“My addiction to pornography and my sexual problem has really taken a toll on my mind,” Castro said in court. He said he had been sexually abused as a child, but the judge cut him off.

The women — Amanda Berry, 27; Gina DeJesus, 23; and Michelle Knight, 32 — were held in seclusion, sometimes chained within the home. The women disappeared between 2002 and 2004, when each was in her teens or early 20s.

Castro fathered a daughter by Berry, who told police that none of them ever saw a doctor.

When the child was born on Christmas Day in 2006, Castro raped one of the other women, who had helped deliver the baby, officials said.

Knight said each of her five pregnancies ended because Castro starved and repeatedly punched her, the grounds for the charges that could have brought the death penalty.

Castro had been scheduled for trial on Aug. 5 on a 977-count indictment, but 40 counts were dropped as part of the deal.

Wearing handcuffs and an orange jail jumpsuit, the bearded Castro looked forward and repeatedly said he knew what was going on in court and that he agreed with the final disposition of the case.

“Are you fully aware of the terms and consent to the agreement?” Russo asked.

“I am aware of that,” Castro replied.

Russo asked whether Castro understood that he was pleading guilty and admitting to all that had been charged.

“Yes, your honor,” Castro replied.

As part of the plea deal, Castro's home will be turned over to county officials and will be demolished.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.