Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court
A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.
The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.
This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Medicare payments to tie doctor, hospital payments to quality rather than volume of care
- Blizzard-stricken East digs out amid forecast 2nd-guessing
- Pentagon puts ‘fork’ in news about ex-captive Bergdahl
- Boehner acknowledges early House GOP ‘stumbles’
- Thieves go for the gold in San Francisco
- Wisconsin’s Walker takes first step toward possible run in 2016
- Senate on track to approve Keystone XL by week’s end
- Democrats, Republicans openly snipe about congressional Benghazi investigation
- House sales tax proposal criticized as attack on states’ rights
- Dems delay Iran sanctions proposal
- Slain Ga. couple known for charity projects