TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Washington Post
Saturday, July 27, 2013, 6:54 p.m.
 

A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.

A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.

The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.

This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Texas man cleared of shooting drunken driver who killed his 2 sons
  2. Pilot missing in Va. fighter crash
  3. Ferguson regains its peace, normalcy
  4. Pair of ‘barbaric murders’ in Philly believed to have been carried out by gang
  5. DuPont fined $1.275M for W.Va. chemical releases
  6. Louisiana Gov. Jindal sues Obama over Common Core
  7. Defense rests in case against ex-Va. governor, first lady
  8. Polygamists set to open winery in border town
  9. Forest Service OKs logging in California forests hit by wildfire
  10. Girl accidentally kills Arizona gun instructor with Uzi
  11. Insurers can discourage sickest patients from enrolling
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.