Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court
A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.
The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.
This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Young white males replace older black men as OD victims as heroin deaths climb
- Feds weighed national standards but let North Dakota set regulations for oil trains’ safety
- Reports: Actor Ford seriously injured in small-plane crash in L.A.
- Latest winter blast strands airline passengers, motorists
- Modified endoscope linked to deadly ‘superbug’ outbreak lacked FDA approval
- Weapon supply vulnerable to hackers, Pentagon official warns
- Lawmakers move to require schools to teach cursive amid Common Core wrangling
- Dig uncovers ancient stone tool in eastern Oregon
- Raw milk has little evidence of antibiotics, FDA survey finds
- Blankenship: US prosecution ‘selective and vindictive’
- Appeals court tosses gag order in ex-coal company CEO’s case