Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court
A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.
The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.
This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Murder charges dropped against sergeant who shot 2 unarmed Iraqi boys
- First Ebola case in U.S. confirmed in Dallas
- Dallas hospital confirms 1st Ebola case in U.S.
- New York City mayor boosts city’s living wage to $13.13
- Pentagon review puts Gitmo transfers on ice
- Feds say $100M in data hacked
- Secret Service chief endures blistering glare of Congress’ questions over White House breach
- FCC backs end to NFL broadcast blackouts
- California becomes 1st state to ban plastic bags
- Medical marijuana use to get court test in Colo.
- Panel says Wis. lawmaker likely broke House rules by advocating for companies in which he owned stock