Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court
A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.
The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.
This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- NYPD: Cop ambush killer told passers-by to watch
- Obama says Sony hack not an act of war
- Obama fires back on foreign policy on Cuba, Russia
- WikiLeaks releases purported CIA documents on operatives’ travel
- Dr. Oz no wizard, fact-checkers say in study showing evidence doesn’t back claims
- Smoking, drinking falls off among teens, but not drug use
- IBM’s Watson supercomputing system to be applied to PTSD
- Ghostly snailfish found at record depth
- Gray wolf decision reversed
- Poor morale, training in Air Force ICBM program spur questions about usefulness as nuclear deterrent
- Bush officials gave CIA wide latitude on interrogation tactics