Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court
A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.
The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.
This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- Clintons hauled in $139M in past 8 years
- Fires’ fury unabated in California
- Dusty Atlantic Ocean thwarts tropical storms
- Analysts expect French laboratory will be able to provide details from examination of jet part
- Despite U.S. dollars and bombs, effort failing to squash ISIS
- Planned Parenthood recordings release halted by judge
- Amid 4-year drought, fears rise of trees dying, falling in California
- Baltimore slayings climb to level unseen in decades
- Suspect in South Carolina church shooting wants to plead guilty to hate crimes, attorney says
- Global lion population falling primarily because of loss of habitat, experts say
- Feds eye use of federal dollars for ads for for-profit colleges