Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court
A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.
The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.
This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
- New heart failure drug works much better than current treatment, study finds
- University of Wisconsin researchers work to customize vegetables for specific uses
- Cleveland welcomes server farms
- Border Patrol agent opens fire on armed militia member in Texas
- Mom charged in girl’s death in line for $1M from her trust fund
- Use of body cameras by police gain favor across nation
- Pilot in Atlantic Ocean crash lost consciousness, Coast Guard says
- Obama backs off immigration vow
- Revival of beer gardens in Milwaukee prompts other cities to consider it to shore up budgets
- Manatee status as ‘endangered’ draws complaints; classification under review
- Senate to look at earthquake risks at California nuke plant