TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Washington Post
Saturday, July 27, 2013, 6:54 p.m.
 

A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.

A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.

The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.

This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Roofs collapse under Buffalo snow; weekend forecast adds to urgency to clear bulk
  2. Globe on track for record heat
  3. E-cigarettes cut cravings, study finds
  4. ‘Sex purchasers’ publicly shamed
  5. Anchorage folk know it’s only a matter of time until typical winter returns
  6. At long last, 100-year-old gets to see the ocean
  7. Finally, a man walks like a gecko in scientists’ lab
  8. Colombian admits importing cocaine
  9. Former Virginia Sen. Webb launches presidential exploratory committee
  10. Police: Gunman killed after shooting at Florida State
  11. Plan in works to speed up schools’ Internet service
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.