TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Washington Post
Saturday, July 27, 2013, 6:54 p.m.
 

A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.

A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.

The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.

This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Obama targets cyber attackers with sanctions
  2. New York City police detective loses badge over Uber driver rage
  3. California issues mandatory water restrictions
  4. Feds won’t prosecute former IRS official Lerner for contempt
  5. National park entry fees on rise as summer nears
  6. Christie rails against high N.J. estate tax
  7. Experts skeptical of N.D.’s new oil train safety checks
  8. Mining for tourists? A dubious economic savior in Appalachia
  9. Mysteries of dark matter come to light in Science study
  10. Appalachian miners wiped out by coal glut they can’t reverse
  11. Privacy and private parts: Nude neighbor exposes law’s limit