TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Companies' religious rights appear headed for top court

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Washington Post
Saturday, July 27, 2013, 6:54 p.m.
 

A federal appeals court ruling on Friday increased the chances that the Supreme Court in its coming term will need to settle whether secular, for-profit corporations must provide contraceptive coverage to employees despite the owners' religious objections.

A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled that a Pennsylvania cabinet-making company owned by a Mennonite family must comply with the contraceptive mandate contained in the Affordable Care Act.

The majority said it “respectfully disagrees” with judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in Denver, who recently narrowly found just the opposite. A split in interpreting federal statutes is usually an invitation for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.

This one is novel: The justices have never said whether a secular corporation is protected by the Constitution or federal statute from complying with a law because of religious objections from its owners.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Deal to improve veterans’ health care costs $17B
  2. Ebola only a plane ride away from U.S.
  3. GAO seeks more drinking water safeguards
  4. $17B remedy for VA pitched
  5. Defense workers with security clearance owed millions in back taxes, GAO finds
  6. Jury picked for trial of former Virginia governor, wife
  7. Obama mulls large-scale move on immigration
  8. ‘Pawn Stars’ store owner plans nearby shopping plaza
  9. Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
  10. House bill lets airlines advertise pre-tax fares
  11. Medicare finances improve as health care inflation slows, trustees say
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.