GOP spurns Obama's 'new deal'
By McClatchy Newspapers
Published: Tuesday, July 30, 2013, 6:30 p.m.
WASHINGTON — President Obama hadn't left the White House on Tuesday to debut his latest economic pitch when Republicans began tearing it apart.
With a “grand bargain” on taxes and spending long stalled, Obama offered what the White House called a new deal: cutting corporate tax rates while boosting investments in jobs.
Though Obama pitched it as a “framework that might help break through the political logjam in Washington and get some of these proven ideas moving,” it landed with a familiar thud on Capitol Hill, viewed largely as the latest gambit in the battle between Republicans and Democrats over fiscal and budget matters.
The White House offered the plan as a bid to spur jobs for the middle class. Forget it, Republicans said.
“All I can say is what he said today really doesn't make much sense,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee.
Congress is scheduled to leave on Friday for a recess that is to last until Sept. 9. So far, there have been no serious talks between the two parties over how to fund the federal government after Oct. 1, when the fiscal year begins.
Without an agreement, much of the government would shut down. While few expect that to happen, this week's political maneuvers are reminders of the deep divisions between the parties and how difficult it will be to find common ground — at least ahead of the clock running out.
Obama's plan would lower the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to no more than 28 percent by eliminating loopholes such as those that incentivize companies to send jobs overseas. Manufacturers would pay a rate no higher than 25 percent, and Obama would use the one-time revenue for infrastructure and manufacturing innovation institutes that connect businesses, universities and federal agencies.
The plan doesn't offer any concessions to Republicans, who want corporate tax reform coupled with individual tax reform. White House spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri told reporters that “the bargain isn't supposed to be for the Republicans, it's for the middle class.”
Obama is scheduled to meet separately on Wednesday with Democrats in the House and Senate on Capitol Hill, but not with Republicans.
“Almost every time, they said ‘no' (to Obama's proposals) before they got in the room, whatever the particular issue at that time was,” said House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md. “His success in meeting with Republicans has been very low, and I think he's probably not very optimistic.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hearing to determine fate of sergeant accused of killing 2 deaf Iraqi boys
- Rival Palestinian to make another attempt at uniting
- Seattle church loses Boy Scout charter because of gay leader
- Senator pitches gasoline tax increase
- Postal Service overhaul expected to appeal to Dems
- Hopes high for muscular dystrophy drug
- Justices critical of Ohio law punishing campaign lies
- Details about USS Cole suspect’s stint in CIA custody must be turned over
- Precautions lack year since fatal blast at plant
- Gun background checks miss fugitives
- Supreme Court voids overall contribution limits to political candidates