Share This Page

Business, donors push House Republicans to act on immigration overhaul

| Tuesday, July 30, 2013, 7:30 p.m.

WASHINGTON — Hundreds of leading business groups and GOP donors called for action on immigration legislation on Tuesday, seeking to increase pressure on House Republicans as lawmakers prepare to leave for a five-week summer recess.

Two letters were released, one signed by more than 400 leading businesses, chambers of commerce and others, and the second by about 100 donors, including boldface names such as former Vice President Dan Quayle and GOP strategist Karl Rove.

Both letters sought to frame the immigration debate partly in economic terms that could sway majority House Republicans, who are debating how to move forward with immigration legislation since the Senate passed a comprehensive bill in June with visa reforms, border security and eventual citizenship for the 11 million immigrants in the country illegally.

No action is expected in the House until fall, at which point Republicans may advance a piecemeal series of single-issue bills beginning with border security.

The potential for the House to reach any agreement with the Senate on a final package that could reach President Obama's desk is very much in doubt.

Signers of the business letter include a range of interests, from AT&T and IBM to the American Meat Institute, the Indiana Farm Bureau and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The letter does not set out specific policies the groups are seeking but argues that the immigration system is “completely incapable” of responding to the national economy or global competition and says that “failure to act is not an option.”

The donor letter makes a political case in addition to an economic one, arguing that blocking action would “risk a long-lasting perception that Republicans would rather see nothing done than pass needed reform.”

The letter calls for a “path to legal status” for immigrants here illegally, stopping short of calling for citizenship.

One signer of the letter, Spencer Zwick, former national finance chairman for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, said that broader language was used to draw as much donor support as possible.

“I think what you want to do with a letter like that is be careful not to let one line destroy the letter,” Zwick said. “I believe if we come up with a pathway to good legal immigration, part of that does mean citizenship, but let's take things one step at a time.”

Another signer, Carlos Gutierrez, former Commerce secretary and a leader of the group Republicans for Immigration Reform, said that he's noticed some “donor fatigue” as his group tries to raise money to fight for overhauling immigration but that it would aim to spend enough to sway 12 to 15 congressional districts.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.