TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

General reveals damage done by Pfc. Manning's leaks of classified information through WikiLeaks

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries


By The Associated Press

Published: Wednesday, July 31, 2013, 8:36 p.m.

FORT MEADE, Md. — The classified information Pfc. Bradley Manning revealed through WikiLeaks fractured U.S. military relationships with foreign governments and Afghan villagers, a former general said Wednesday at the soldier's sentencing hearing.

It was the first time that testimony about the actual damage the leaks may have caused has been allowed at trial.

Retired Army Brig. Gen. Robert Carr said the material Manning leaked identified hundreds of friendly Afghan villagers by name, causing some of them to stop helping U.S. forces.

“One of our primary missions is to protect the population over there,” said Carr, who led a Defense Department task force that looked at the risks of the leaks. “We had to get close to the population, had to understand that population, and we had to protect them. If the adversary had more clarity, as to which people in the village were collaborating with the U.S. forces, then there is a chance that those folks could be at greater risk.”

A former intelligence analyst, Manning was convicted of 20 of 22 charges for sending hundreds of thousands of government and diplomatic secrets to WikiLeaks and faces up to 136 years in prison. He was found not guilty of aiding the enemy, which alone could have meant life in prison without parole.

Manning's defense is hoping for a much shorter prison sentence and asked the military judge hearing the case to merge two of his espionage convictions and two of his theft convictions. If Army Col. Denise Lind agrees to do so, the private would face up to 116 years in prison.

Carr said the Taliban killed an Afghan man who had a relationship with the United States, and later the Taliban said publicly the man was associated with the Manning leaks. The general, however, could not find the Afghan's name in the material Manning revealed.

The release of diplomatic cables, war zone logs and videos embarrassed the United States and its allies. American officials warned of dire consequences in the days immediately after the first disclosures in July 2010, but a Pentagon review later suggested those fears might have been overblown.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Rival Palestinian to make another attempt at uniting
  2. Hearing to determine fate of sergeant accused of killing 2 deaf Iraqi boys
  3. Postal Service overhaul expected to appeal to Dems
  4. ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
  5. Images best of readied D-Day ships
  6. Precautions lack year since fatal blast at plant
  7. Gun background checks miss fugitives
  8. Recovery expert believes wreckage of missing plane located
  9. Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
  10. Washington’s snowy owl recovers from apparent bus crash, returns to wild
  11. Shale oil, gas drilling boom wins favor with labor unions, thwarting environmentalists
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.