Diarrhea outbreak in 16 states tied to salad; Mexican facility blamed
By USA Today
Published: Friday, Aug. 2, 2013, 8:54 p.m.
The outbreak of a diarrheal disease has been linked, at least in Iowa and Nebraska, to a salad mix provided to restaurants by the Mexican subsidiary of an American foodservice company, the Food and Drug Administration said on Friday.
At least 400 cases of cyclospora infection had been reported in 16 states as of Thursday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said late Wednesday.
Iowa and Nebraska state health officials had linked illnesses in those states to a salad mix. The FDA announced that the salad mix was produced by Taylor Farms de Mexico, a subsidiary of Taylor Farms of Kingsburg, Calif.
The FDA investigation found that illness clusters at four restaurants in those states were traced to Taylor Farms de Mexico as the common supplier, the agency said in a release.
FDA has staffers working with the firm and will be conducting an environmental assessment of the company's processing facility in Mexico to try to learn the cause of the outbreak.
The company has been cooperating fully with all FDA requests.
Taylor Farms is an American producer of prepackaged salads and cut vegetables, based in California's Central Valley. The company was founded in 1995. As many American produce suppliers do, it has subsidiaries in Mexico where it grows produce in the winter.
FDA officials said they inspected the Taylor Farms de Mexico facility in 2011 and “found no notable issues.”
The agency plans to increase its surveillance of green leafy products being imported into the country from Mexico.
The Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals and the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services say they do not believe the contaminated salad mix is still in the food supply in those states.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- FDA to curb antibiotic use in livestock
- House Republicans signal support for budget deal
- ‘Apparent mercy killings’ claim 2 in L.A.
- Rally pushes for answers in Ga. teenager’s death in mat
- Arizona officer living in U.S. illegally resigns
- Space station cooler on fritz
- Iraq War vet to get $645K in California police beating
- Some breast cancer treatments downplayed
- Health care website in review, Sebelius tells House panel
- Farm bill off for now, but milk prices not expected to spike — yet
- Budget deal reverses $63B in cuts, excludes extension of jobless benefits