Furloughs delay patient care at military centers
Patients at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and other premiere military hospitals are being sent to private doctors and having surgery and other treatment delayed because of furloughs to medical personnel, according to interviews and internal documents.
“Please show (patients) the utmost understanding and care while we are asking them to accept longer wait times and in some cases, curtailed or limited services,” Rear Adm. Alton Stocks, hospital commander, told staff in a July 12 message.
A “colleagues” memo issued in recent days says inpatient beds are in “critically short supply” because of furloughs of civilian staff triggered by federal spending cuts known as sequestration.
The memo encourages “dispositions/discharges as soon as possible.” Hospital spokesperson Sandy Dean explained this direction, saying, “We are encouraging health care providers to be more efficient when handling their paperwork instead of writing discharge orders later in the day. ... No patient has been or will be discharged before it is medically appropriate.”
With cases of post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health problems at an all-time high, Dean says civilian caregivers in the hospital's in-patient mental health section are furloughed, reducing beds there from 28 to 22.
Most serious combat wounded and other medical cases are given priority as routine treatments are delayed, officials said.
Military families complain on the National Military Family Association website of waiting longer for medical appointments, immunizations for infants and getting someone to answer the phone at small medical clinics.
Similar cutbacks occurring across military medicine are “definitely impacting our ability to deliver health care,” said Maj. Gen. Richard Thomas, commander of 11 Army hospitals in the western United States. Just in the first month of furloughs, 10,000 routine patient appointments in the western Army medical region have been delayed because of staffing shortages, Thomas says.
The Pentagon's top medical official, Jonathan Woodson, assistant secretary of Defense for health affairs, called the cuts illogical and a significant threat.
“We simply cannot continue to sustain the burdens placed on the military medical system if sequester remains the law of the land,” Woodson says. “The men and women who have fought tirelessly on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan ... deserve much, much more than this.”
Thomas said that by sending patients to a network of private doctors who contract with the government for services, the Pentagon will spend more money in order to compensate for the automatic spending cuts.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Despite sunny forecast, South Carolina ordeal far from over
- Hillary Clinton kept in touch with key donors, emails show
- Publisher apologizes for textbook calling slaves ‘workers’
- South Carolina flood: Door-to-door searches, swamped roads
- Oregon shooter ranted in manifesto about having no girlfriend
- Benghazi transcript on way, defying GOP leaders on committee
- Supreme Court won’t hear insider trading case
- Survivor: Oregon college gunman spared 1 to give police a message
- Key cod-fishing spots in dire shape
- Study finds potential problem in heart valve implants
- Coast Guard believes El Faro container ship sank