Chemical reporting system riddled with failure
NEW YORK — A 27-year-old program intended to warn the public of the presence of hazardous chemicals is flawed in many states because of scant oversight and lax reporting by plant owners, a Reuters examination finds.
Under the federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, private and public facilities must issue an inventory listing potentially hazardous chemicals stored on their properties. The inventory, known as a Tier II report, is filed with state, county and local emergency management officials. The information is then supposed to be made publicly available to help first responders and nearby residents plan for emergencies.
But facilities across the country often misidentify these chemicals or their location and sometimes fail to report the existence of the substances altogether.
And except for a handful of states, neither federal nor local authorities are auditing the reports for errors.
Reuters identified dozens of errors in Tier II reports in recent years and found several facilities that failed to report altogether.
Two states — Illinois and Wisconsin — introduced errors into the public databases through which they disclose information from Tier II reports. The reports document the presence of hazardous chemicals, such as ammonium nitrate, lead, sulfuric acid and diesel fuel.
In 2006, clothing company Carhartt Inc. failed to report that its plant in Morehead, Ky., was storing chlorine on the premises. Two firefighters were exposed and one suffered chemical burns when they shut a leaking valve at the plant without proper safety gear. Carhartt said the plant was shuttered at the time of the leak but did not say why reports weren't filed.
This year, a water treatment facility in Valley City, N.D., failed to submit a Tier II report. After Reuters notified state officials, the plant filed a Tier II showing the presence of a host of toxic or explosive materials, including ammonium hydroxide, chlorine, sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, sodium permanganate, hydrochloric acid and phosphoric acid. Company officials said they are not sure why no reports were filed and are looking into the issue.
In June, homes and businesses in Seward, Ill., were evacuated for a day after a fire and explosion at Nova-Kem LLC injured one employee and released a plume of smoke containing caustic and toxic chemicals, including chlorine gas. The company, which makes compounds used in high-tech applications, did not report storing hazardous chemicals, according to Dennis Lolli, coordinator of the Winnebago County Emergency Services and Disaster Agency.
No firefighters were injured. But for emergency teams, knowing what chemicals they are facing is critical, Lolli said.
“I don't know why they didn't” file the reports, he said. “It certainly takes away an advantage.”
Representatives of Nova-Kem did not respond to requests for comment.
There are hundreds of thousands of sites nationwide required to report hazardous chemical inventories under the Tier II system. About 500,000 chemicals are subject to the requirement.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama signs $607B Defense bill but blasts GOP limits for Gitmo
- Los Angeles-based water agency’s land buy rattles California farmers
- Peanut glut poses hefty bailout tab for taxpayers
- ‘Crisis mode’ near at U.S.-Mexico line as nearly 5,000 children try to cross border in October
- Obama: No credible intelligence about terror plot against US
- New Hampshire cancer patient gets permission to travel to Maine for medical pot
- Feds tell railroads they must meet deadlines for lifesaving technology
- Barrier nears completion in Indiana marsh to keep Asian carp from Great Lakes
- Foreign policy expert: Obama administration should create Syria safe areas
- Not-guilty plea entered in case of Kentucky girl’s death
- Poll: 4 in 10 know someone who has been addicted to prescription painkillers