Oswald's cemetery mate Nick Beef still alive in New York
NEW YORK — For years, curiosity seekers visiting the Fort Worth grave of Lee Harvey Oswald have wondered about the simple headstone next door, marked Nick Beef.
It turns out Nick Beef is alive and living in New York.
The 56-year-old man who uses that name purchased the cemetery plot next to Oswald's in 1975 and had the granite marker placed there in 1997, The New York Times reported on Saturday.
Beef, born Patric Abedin, now lives in Manhattan and calls himself a non-performing performance artist.
On Nov. 21, 1963, President John F. Kennedy and his wife, Jacqueline, landed at the former Carswell Air Force Base in Fort Worth as part of a two-day Texas tour.
Beef, then 6 years old, was sitting on the shoulders of a military police officer in the crowd when the first couple passed just a few feet away.
Oswald shot Kennedy the next day.
When he was 18, Beef read that the plot next to Oswald's was available. He bought it for $17.50 down and 16 monthly payments of $10.
Beef said he has often asked himself why he wanted it. “It meant something to me in life” is his answer.
Beef moved to New York. He did some freelance comedy writing using the name Nick Beef.
His mother died in 1996, and he went to Texas to arrange her funeral.
He told the Times that during his stay, he visited his burial plot and decided to buy a gravestone with the exact dimensions as Oswald's. He told the cemetery official to inscribe it Nick Beef.
He has no plans to be buried there. He prefers to be cremated.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- WWII pilot takes off in B-29 yet again
- Superstorm Sandy-hit areas in New York, New Jersey remain vulnerable
- Hungry Yosemite National Park bears tracked by GPS
- Teacher tried to stop school shooting
- Officers swarm California counties as deputies killed in shooting rampage
- Chicago train riders to undergo random baggage screening
- Panetta skipped CIA’s OK of book, potentially putting agency in delicate position with others
- Philadelphia Mafia figure returned to prison for meeting friend
- Anti-abortion group tries to sway votes of women in Democratic households
- Congress rankings detail its ‘poorest’ federal lawmakers
- 3 Supreme Court justices offer Yale students an insider’s look at personalities