Obamas in Martha's Vineyard, Mass., for 9-day summer vacation
WASHINGTON — The first summer vacation of President Obama's second term is taking him and his family back to Martha's Vineyard, the well-heeled Massachusetts island he avoided during last year's re-election campaign.
His return is causing a bit of an uproar among residents. The Secret Service plans to close part of a public road near the six-bedroom home Obama is renting in Chilmark, a first for presidential vacations on the island known as a refuge for the wealthy and the well-connected.
Obama arrived on Saturday afternoon for a nine-day vacation.
No official public appearances were expected during his stay. He is due back in Washington on Aug. 18.
Obama will be briefed regularly on a full range of issues, including the al-Qaida threat that led the government to shutter embassies and consulates in the Middle East and North Africa, said White House press secretary Jay Carney.
Beyond that, the president will play golf, hit the beach, dine out, relax with his family and read something other than a White House briefing book. He engaged in all those activities and more during his earlier presidential vacations on the island.
“The president very much looks forward to being able to spend a few days with his family,” Carney said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Senante begins new debate on federal role for schools
- In 2005, Cosby said he got drugs to give women for sex
- Markets ‘shrug off’ Greece debt saga
- Texas wants its gold back in the state’s borders
- Veterans ID card bill shows difficulty of approving legislation in Congress
- Gowdy denies accusation of leak of Clinton emails info
- Maryland mother charged with leaving baby on roadside
- Police: No evidence of gunshot at Walter Reed hospital
- Chicago father won’t cooperate with police in shooting death of boy, 7
- Obama vows to stick with current strategy against Islamic State
- New Horizons flyby of Pluto on track despite computer glitch