Rubio: Act on immigration, or Obama will
By The Associated Press
Published: Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2013, 9:06 p.m.
WASHINGTON — Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio warned on Tuesday that if Congress doesn't pass immigration overhaul legislation, President Obama may act on his own to legalize the 11 million or more immigrants in the United States illegally.
Rubio, a potential presidential candidate and an author of the extensive immigration bill that passed the Senate in June but stalled in the House, noted that the Obama administration took action a year ago to give legal status to many immigrants brought here illegally as children. He said without congressional action, the president might be tempted to do the same for everyone else here illegally.
“I believe that this president will be tempted, if nothing happens in Congress, he will be tempted to issue an executive order like he did for the DREAM Act kids a year ago where he basically legalizes 11 million people by the sign of a pen,” Rubio said on “The Morning Show with Preston Scott” on Tallahassee radio station WFLA.
Rubio said the possibility highlighted the need for congressional action because the alternative would be legalization without benefits such as border security and an E-Verify system to require employers to check their workers' legal status.
“We can't leave it, in my mind, the way it is, because I think a year from now, we could find ourselves with all 11 million people here legally under an executive order from the president, but no E-Verify, no more border security, no more border agents — none of the other reforms that we desperately need,” Rubio said.
The White House disputed Rubio's comments.
Asked whether Obama would be “tempted” to issue executive orders as Rubio suggested, White House spokesman Bobby Whithorne said, “No. The only solution to this problem is for Congress to fix the broken immigration system by passing comprehensive reform.”
Rubio's comments came with lawmakers back home in their districts for Congress' five-week summer recess, which activists on both sides of the immigration issue are trying to use to make their case for or against action in the GOP-controlled House.
Under pressure from advocates for reform, several House Republicans have indicated qualified support for a path to citizenship for the immigrants here illegally, something that's part of the Senate bill but opposed by many conservatives.
But it is unclear whether one side will clearly prevail in time for lawmakers to return to work in September, or what will happen then.
GOP House leaders have said they plan to proceed with the immigration issue with single-issue bills, beginning with border security, so it remains to be seen whether they'll get to the point of entering negotiations with the Senate on a package that could reach Obama's desk.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
- IRS, other agencies award contracts to license plate tracking company
- Health care law enrollee passwords at risk for Heartbleed Internet security flaw, feds warn
- Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
- Washington’s snowy owl recovers from apparent bus crash, returns to wild
- Del Taco customers mistakenly charged thousands for fast-food meals
- Drug crime reclassification to help ex-cons get vote rights
- Fox fires exec who used email to plan aid
- First date in New Jersey ends with him pilfering her TV and Yorkshire terrier
- Automaker GM’s wait on Saturn Ion safety recall took years
- Mauling puts bears back on firing line in Central Florida