ShareThis Page

Area 51 exists, CIA admits, but no mention of UFOs materializes

| Friday, Aug. 16, 2013, 9:06 p.m.

LOS ANGELES — Area 51 has to be the worst-kept secret in the aerospace industry.

It's where some of the most innovative military aircraft ever built by Lockheed Martin Corp.'s Skunk Works were flight tested. Supposedly.

For decades, the government has refused to acknowledge the existence of the military outpost, which is about 100 miles outside of Las Vegas. Until now.

For the first time, Area 51 has been recognized by the CIA, according to a newly declassified history of the U-2 program.

The documents were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by Jeffrey T. Richelson, a National Security Archive senior fellow at George Washington University.

It's known that Area 51 was created during the Cold War so the military could test cutting-edge projects including the U-2 spy plane, the SR-71 Blackbird and the F-117 Nighthawk without worrying about being discovered.

There have been numerous historical essays and books published about the site — even photos. But because of the new documents, the accuracy can be verified, according to Richelson.

“The newly released material provides a combination of significant new material, official confirmation of — or corrections to — what has been written and official acknowledgment that permits researchers to follow up the disclosures with FOIA or Mandatory Declassification Review requests that may produce even more information,” he said.

The documents show numerous references to Area 51 and Groom Lake, with a map of the area.

Area 51 has been ground zero for conspiracy theorists for decades.

Flying saucers. Bug-eyed aliens. Staged moon landings.

The lengthy report contains no reference to little green men from outer space.

“There is a section on the relationship between the U-2 program being responsible for UFO sightings,” Richelson said. “But if people are looking for sections on dead aliens and interspecies contact, they'll be disappointed. It's just not there.”

In truth, Area 51 was the proving grounds for Lockheed's biggest programs. The Skunk Works got its nickname in 1943 at its original Burbank headquarters, which was located next to a manufacturing plant that produced a strong odor.

At the time, a worker jokingly called the facility “Skunk Works,” a reference to a remote location in the popular comic strip Li'l Abner, where a hermetic character brewed a foul concoction from worn shoes and dead skunks.

The name stuck. It's now headquartered in Palmdale, Calif

The Skunk Works produced the high-flying U-2 spy plane that was first designed during the Eisenhower administration to breach the Iron Curtain and, as engineers said, snap “picture postcards for Ike” of hidden military strongholds in the Soviet Union. The jet still flies today.

The SR-71 Blackbird flew reconnaissance missions starting in 1966 at speeds exceeding Mach 3 and altitudes of 85,000 feet.

The last SR-71 mission was in the spring of 1995.

It remains a technological marvel. On Sept. 1, 1974, an SR-71 flew from New York to London in 1 hour, 54 minutes, 56 seconds. It beat the previous trans-Atlantic speed record by nearly three hours.Skunk Works also built the F-117 Nighthawk, the world's first radar-evading aircraft, which attacked the most heavily fortified targets in Iraq during Operation Desert Storm in 1991.

It was the only coalition jet allowed to strike targets inside Baghdad's city limits.

And those are just the Area 51 aircraft we know about.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.