TribLIVE

| USWorld


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Suit planned over IRS designations

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Washington Post
Tuesday, Aug. 20, 2013, 10:30 p.m.
 

WASHINGTON — A top House Democrat plans to file a lawsuit in federal district court on Wednesday challenging the Internal Revenue Service's interpretation of a law that governs whether groups qualify for tax-exempt status as “social welfare organizations.”

Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., the ranking minority-party member of the House Budget Committee, said on Tuesday that he will serve as lead plaintiff in the case, which addresses one of the main concerns that surfaced with the recent IRS targeting controversy: differences between federal law and the IRS rules on eligibility for 501(c)(4) candidates.

Current law says the organizations must engage “exclusively” in social welfare activities, but the IRS' tax code requires only that they are “primarily engaged” in such purposes. That discrepancy has led to confusion for application processors, who have struggled to determine what constitutes political activity and how much should disqualify groups from tax exemption, according to agency officials.

“I don't think the IRS should be in the business of determining whether the primary purpose of an organization is political or educational,” Van Hollen said. “The statute is very clear they should not be in that business.”

Dean Patterson, an IRS spokesman declined to comment on the planned suit but noted that the agency's 2013-2014 work plan, released Aug. 9, calls for new guidance on determining 501(c)(4) eligibility.

The IRS controversy arose from an inspector general's audit that found the agency inappropriately targeted applicants for extra scrutiny based on their names, which often suggested political preferences. The issue led to a string of congressional hearings, apologies from agency officials, ongoing congressional investigations and personnel actions, including the forced resignation of acting IRS commissioner Steve Miller.

House Republicans, especially Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp (Mich.) and Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa (Calif.), have focused their investigative efforts on determining whether the behavior was designed to stifle conservative activism during the 2010 and 2012 election cycles.

Democrats have largely attributed the problem to poor management and a lack of clarity on tax-exemption rules that caused processors to examine hundreds of cases more closely with guidance from IRS officials in Washington.

Three campaign finance watchdog groups — Democracy 21, the Campaign Legal Center and Public Citizen — are joining Van Hollen in the lawsuit. They have scheduled a teleconference Wednesday to discuss the legal action.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed a similar lawsuit against the IRS.

 

 
 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Secret Service chief resigns after security lapses
  2. MIT: Global Energy Use, CO2 May Double By 2100
  3. Threat leads to evacuation of Sandy Hook school
  4. West Virginia has tallied 45,500 storage tanks so far
  5. Murder charges dropped against sergeant who shot 2 unarmed Iraqi boys
  6. 2-headed turtle found in Maine
  7. Security whips up service problems at CIA Starbucks
  8. Cost of taking fight to ISIS pegged at $2.4B to $6.8B a year
  9. Intruder made it to East Room of White House, overpowered Secret Service officer
  10. Feds say $100M in data hacked
  11. First Ebola case in U.S. confirmed in Dallas
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.