Indiana sued over abortion pill measure by Planned Parenthood
INDIANAPOLIS — Planned Parenthood on Thursday filed a federal challenge to a new Indiana law requiring clinics that administer the so-called abortion pill to have full surgical facilities, a requirement it says would halt abortion services in a central Indiana clinic.
Under the law, Planned Parenthood would have to upgrade its clinic in Lafayette, Ind., to surgical standards or stop administering RU-486, commonly called the abortion pill, the nonprofit said in a lawsuit filed in Indianapolis federal court.
Imposing surgical facility requirements on clinics where no surgery is performed “is not only unreasonable, it is utterly irrational,” Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky said in the lawsuit, which seeks a federal court injunction.
Legislators supporting the law that took effect July 1 have said it would protect women's health. It requires clinics providing nonsurgical abortions to have separate procedure, recovery and scrub rooms like surgical centers starting Jan. 1.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Feds fault security of tax info gathered for health care law benefits
- Doctor 1st Ebola virus case in New York City
- Fight against Islamic State at impasse, military commanders say
- Court: IRS not targeting conservative tax-exempt groups
- Federal officials: Dallas nurse free of Ebola
- West Virginia University expels 3 students for postgame misconduct
- Huge gold nugget goes on sale for $400K
- Academic scandal at University of North Carolina bigger than previously reported
- White House may enhance security