Fewer schools promote junk food
ATLANTA — There's been a big shift in how many school districts take money from soda companies and ban junk food from vending machines, health officials say.
A government survey found 44 percent of school districts banned junk food from vending machines last year, up from 30 percent in 2006.
It also found drops in how many districts took a cut of soft drink sales, received donations from soda companies or allowed soda company advertising.
Those are considered positive steps in helping the nation reduce the number of children who are overweight and obese.
But it's not clear how much impact the changes are having. The overall proportion of children who are overweight or obese has been holding steady at about 17 percent, according to government statistics.
Experts say that diet and exercise at home are at least as important as what kids are exposed to in school.
“There are lots and lots of factors that go into obesity rates,” said Nancy Brener, lead author of the government report on the study. She is a health scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The findings come from a detailed government survey last year of more than 800 school districts. The CDC does the study every six years.
She noted that the study measured school district policies, which is different than asking what was going on at individual schools. Sometimes there's a difference, but CDC doesn't have information on how often that happens.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- IRS calls right-wing Republicans ‘crazies’ in emails
- NYC police unions lose bid in stop-and-frisk case
- 6 narcotics officers charged with racketeering
- Ground Zero ship dated to 1773
- Law enforcement, intelligence agencies want to ‘like’ you on social media
- N.Y. opera proposes mediation as lockout looms
- $17B emergency funding for Veterans Affairs health care system passes House, heads to Senate
- Army to begin interrogation of swapped POW
- Senate report to question detention, interrogation practices, secrecy at CIA after 9/11
- Ax disengages from truck on I-95, sticks in windshield of car behind it
- Stowaway’s access to Air Force plane eyed