Majority of Americans opposes withholding funding for health care law, poll shows
WASHINGTON — While Americans remain deeply divided over President Obama's health care law, a clear majority opposes withholding funding to implement the 2010 law, a new national survey indicates.
Fifty-seven percent of Americans say they disapprove of cutting off funding for the Affordable Care Act, while just 36 percent say they would approve such a move, according to the most recent poll from the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation.
Making suspension of the health care law a condition for funding of the federal government has emerged this summer as a favored strategy by many Republicans looking for ways to derail final implementation of the law.
A large group of GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill has urged Republican leaders to reject any government appropriations legislation this fall that continues to provide money for the law, even if the move would lead to the shutdown of the federal government.
But nearly 7 in 10 Americans who oppose this tactic said in the recent poll that “using the budget process to stop a law is not the way our government should work.”
Fifty-six percent of respondents who oppose the use of budget politics cited concerns that “without funding, the law will be crippled and won't work as planned.”
The latest Kaiser poll contained some troublesome findings for supporters of the law. Skepticism of the legislation remains high, with those holding unfavorable views of the law outnumbering those favoring it, 42 percent to 37 percent.
And 4 in 10 Americans continue to believe the law will leave the country worse off, compared with just over 3 in 10 who believe it will make the country better off.
The nationwide poll of 1,503 randomly selected adults was conducted Aug. 13-19. The margin of error is plus or minus three percentage points for the full sample.
Enrollment in insurance exchanges for those not on work-sponsored coverage or government plans begins Oct. 1. The law takes effect Jan. 1.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pair of NYC officers killed in ambush shooting
- 3-D printed prosthetics give dog ability to run
- Poor morale, training in Air Force ICBM program spur questions about usefulness as nuclear deterrent
- Teenager who attacked California Highway Patrol officer with machete shot, killed
- Killer of New York police officers angry over Garner chokehold death, officials say
- IBM’s Watson supercomputing system to be applied to PTSD
- Document hunt to begin for illegals who need proof of residency since 2010 for permit, reprieve
- Cat saved from California storm drain after 2 weeks
- N.Y. reports crime decrease, credits ‘broken windows’
- 4 Afghans freed from Guantanamo
- Financial fraudster used investors’ lucre to freeze dead wife, feds contend