Gettysburg College to show Warhol Polaroids
GETTYSBURG — Campbell's soup cans and brightly colored celebrity faces often come to mind when the name Andy Warhol is mentioned.
But when Gettysburg College senior Emily Francisco learned her school owned a collection of 153 Polaroids and photographs by Warhol, she set out to display the lesser-known works.
Warhol, who often carried a Polaroid camera with him, used his snapshots as sketches to complete paintings later on. He took tens of thousands of Polaroid photographs throughout his career.
“I chose from a list of a mix between Polaroids and silver gelatin prints,” Francisco said. “Hopefully, people will be able to understand the nature and instant process of the photos when they see them.”
In 2008, the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts divided some of the artist's photos and offered them to university galleries around the country, including Gettysburg College's Schmucker Gallery, gallery Director Shannon Egen said.
Egen waited to display the photos until the right time and student came along.
Francisco, who spent time working for the Philadelphia Art Museum, visited the Andy Warhol Museum in Pittsburgh as part of her final research for the exhibit.
She chose six female and six male portraits for display. Subjects include dancer Martha Graham and Canadian hockey player Wayne Gretzky.
“I want to develop a relationship between the celebrity interest Warhol had and the everyday person as their own celebrity,” Francisco said. “He loved celebrities, but it is different from everything else he has done.”
The display will include four portraits of objects, including one titled “The Last Supper.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.