Bicyclists, pedestrians get their own lanes on new span
OAKLAND, Calif. — The commute on Tuesday across the new eastern span of the Bay Bridge gave drivers and bicyclists alike their first close-up encounter with the span's signature 525-foot tower and new vistas of the bay.
“It was awesome,” said Twitter employee Dan Sullivan, 36, who drove across the span for the first time on Tuesday. “It was a very good experience, actually. A very open feeling. You hardly notice the old bridge at all.”
The span opened ahead of schedule on Monday, marking the end of 11 years of construction.
The morning commute traffic was not unusual, and there were no reports of accidents on the bridge, California Highway Patrol Officer Sam Morgan said.
A pedestrian and bicycle path on the span opened to the public at noon.
The pathway has two lanes for bicyclists and one lane for pedestrians. For now, views for those headed west are obstructed by the old span of the bridge on the left and the new span on the right. Demolition of the old span of the bridge is under way.
A bicycle trip to the end of the path took 53-year-old Cyndi Baird of Albany about 30 minutes.
“The ride was nice 'cause you don't have to deal with traffic,” Baird said. “I think it's amazing and truly magnificent structure, and I was glad to get up here today and make history.”
The early opening Monday night drew lines of cars along West Grand Avenue in Oakland, starting at 5:30 p.m. Some waited hours to be among the first to cross the new span.
The 2.2-mile replacement span, which cost $6.4 billion, is the most expensive public works project in state history.
“The s-curve is gone, so basically you come off the span and you come straight into the tunnel,” said Sullivan, of his first crossing. “It kind of feels like a new tunnel, but it's not. They kind of dressed it up a little bit.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- National Weather Service to evaluate work after missed call on storm
- Systemic flaws found in safety oversight of gas pipelines
- Pittsburgh travelers feel effects of Northeast blizzard
- Blizzard howls its way into Boston but largely spares NYC
- Medicare payments to tie doctor, hospital payments to quality rather than volume of care
- VA plans major structure changes; Pittsburgh’s fate as regional HQ remains unclear
- Northeast waits for foot (or 2) of snow to drop
- Asthma study says disease is not ‘inner-city plague’
- American drone hit kills al-Qaida terror suspects in Yemen
- Dems stall Keystone XL legislation
- Educator in California pleads guilty to sexual abuse of children