TribLIVE

| USWorld

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Terrorism case gets new twist

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Daily Photo Galleries

'American Coyotes' Series

Traveling by Jeep, boat and foot, Tribune-Review investigative reporter Carl Prine and photojournalist Justin Merriman covered nearly 2,000 miles over two months along the border with Mexico to report on coyotes — the human traffickers who bring illegal immigrants into the United States. Most are Americans working for money and/or drugs. This series reports how their operations have a major impact on life for residents and the environment along the border — and beyond.

By The Associated Press
Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2013, 10:00 p.m.
 

CHICAGO — A federal judge in a Chicago terrorism case has undone a key ruling in which she found the government need not divulge whether its investigation relied on expanded phone and Internet surveillance programs — opening the sensitive issue back up to debate.

U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman took the rare step over the weekend of vacating that initial finding days after siding with government attorneys prosecuting Adel Daoud, a 19-year-old citizen accused of trying to ignite what he thought was a bomb next to a downtown Chicago bar last year.

Former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden leaked documents revealing the scope of surveillance programs earlier this year.

If they learn the government did use enhanced surveillance to trigger its investigation of Daoud, defense lawyers have said they would challenge subsequent evidence on grounds it violated protections against unreasonable searches.

Coleman last week seemed to dash defense hopes of mounting such a constitutional challenge when she accepted prosecutors' argument that — because they don't intend to use evidence derived directly from expanded surveillance at Daoud's trial — they aren't required to disclose if they relied on the programs.

In a brief docket entry Sunday, however, Coleman granted a defense motion that she vacate her earlier ruling. The judge wrote that she found “no prejudice in allowing further examination of this issue.”

Both defense attorneys and a prosecutors' spokesman declined comment Tuesday.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Nation

  1. Fetal parts in Planned Parenthood lab shown in 4th video
  2. Feds eye use of federal dollars for ads for for-profit colleges
  3. Protesters ousted in bid to block Shell icebreaker on Portland river
  4. Minn. dentist laying low in slaying of lion
  5. VA whistle-blowers aghast
  6. Feds accuse Philadelphia congressman Fattah of corruption
  7. Highway bill on Obama’s desk extends funding 3 months
  8. Geological gem The Wave on Arizona-Utah border draws worldwide visitors
  9. OSU band song mocked Holocaust victims
  10. San Francisco’s Chinatown clings to roots amid tech boom
  11. In dispute over coal mine project, two ways of life hang in the balance