Veterans charity settles lawsuit
By The Associated Press
Published: Saturday, Sept. 7, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
SAN FRANCISCO — A California veterans charity that supplies arts and crafts to hospitalized servicemen and women agreed on Friday to pay $2.45 million and purge its leadership to settle a lawsuit filed by the state alleging misuse of funds.
State Attorney General Kamala Harris filed the suit last year because Legislative hearings suggested leaders of Help Hospitalized Veterans were paying executives too much and spending funds on golf membership and a condominium.
Harris said the estate of former group President Roger Chapin will pay back the charity $2 million in excessive salary he collected over several years. Chapin died in August.
The current president, Michael Lynch, and four board members will step down and all have agreed to be banned from serving a charity again in an executive capacity.
The charity's lawyers didn't return calls for comment.
“It's unconscionable that Help Hospitalized Veterans officials misused charitable money intended for those who served and have sacrificed for our country,” Harris said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- 5th Amendment cited in N.J. bridge inquiry
- Lerner emails looked for way out of difficulties at the IRS
- Senate plan aims to overhaul Fannie, Freddie
- NTSB chair Hersman steps down
- Georgia wants ‘slow poke’ drivers to stay in right lane
- Wiretaps to be included in Blagojevich appeal
- Documents show guilty D.C. businessman gave $600K for Hillary canvassers
- Mo. man freed in editor’s death sues for $100M
- Floodwaters fall in Montana, Wyoming
- Prostitution found to have vast economic impact
- FDA approves migraine treatment device