Recipe for life possibly landed on Earth in crash of comet
LIVERMORE, Calif. — Life started with a dirty snowball, tossed at Earth from space.
That is the conclusion reached by a group of international scientists, confirming a theory conceived by a Lawrence Livermore Laboratory researcher. The team fired a speeding projectile into a special ice mixture, generating a hot and high-pressure environment — akin to the comets that streak through the heavens, piercing our atmosphere.
And presto: Out of the explosion came life's raw materials, called amino acids.
This final product — a pound of “goop,” said Livermore Lab researcher Nir Goldman — is a modest ancestor to our now-gloriously lively Earth.
But it is not the only explanation for how our home took its first halting steps to becoming alive. Dozens of other teams are exploring alternate theories.
“But these studies prove that this is one avenue in which amino acids were produced, early on,” said Goldman. “It is exciting to ponder the different avenues that could have been the origin of life.”
Using computer simulations performed on lab supercomputers, Goldman proposed in 2010 and again in 2013 that an icy comet crashing into Earth billions of years ago could have produced amino acids.
It is known that comets bombarded the Earth between 3.8 billion and 4.5 billion years ago. It is likely that the comet that triggered life hit us at an oblique angle, rather than a direct smash, he said.
Amid the ice, the comets bore carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia and other trace gases — precursors of amino acids.
These simple molecules could have supplied the raw materials of life, Goldman believes. And the impact with early Earth would have yielded the energy to drive this prebiotic chemistry.
Goldman's idea was put to the test and proven by British collaborators, whose findings are published in the latest issue of the journal Nature Geosciences.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Cedar Point attraction mishap injures 2 riders
- U.S. coal exports undermine clean air efforts, experts say
- Automatically renewing Obamacare plans may backfire
- Lawmakers say answering Census survey should be voluntary
- Tentative deal reached on VA reforms
- Gun advocates chalk up 2nd win this year with D.C. ruling
- National Gallery, Uffizi collaborate on Piero di Cosimo exhibit
- Stoned volunteers test drug, alcohol effect on driving
- Lightning strikes 14 in Calif., leaves 2 critically hurt
- Western firefighters stay busy
- Trial to begin for video in Oklahoma City bombing