Navy Yard killer shot at random, footage shows
WASHINGTON — Video footage inside Building 197 at the Washington Navy Yard shows Aaron Alexis “calmly” walking down the hallways of four floors and stepping into offices, firing indiscriminately at people and reloading from shotgun shells he had stuffed inside the pockets of his black cargo pants.
The footage, disclosed on Thursday by FBI Director James B. Comey in a news briefing, makes clear the 34-year-old civilian contractor on Monday morning was not targeting any individuals but rather was intent on shooting as many people as possible, even shooting a security guard and grabbing his weapon to continue the killing.
Separately, Congress has asked the inspector general at the federal Office of Personnel Management to investigate how a clearance was awarded to Alexis, who killed 12 people inside Building 197 before he was shot and killed by police. Weeks ago, the Navy warned employees under its new “insider threat” program that all personnel were responsible for reporting suspicious activity that could lead to terrorism, espionage or “kinetic actions” — a military euphemism for violence.
“The clearance piece of this is one, I think, we very clearly have to take another look at,” said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
The Navy Yard reopened for operations on Thursday, but it was hardly business as usual. Returning employees said they felt unsettled. Workers who streamed by the red brick wall of the Navy Yard in the early morning sun said it was too soon to talk about the violence.
Indeed, Comey said, the rampage went on for at least half an hour until police responding to the base on the capital city's waterfront finally exchanged gunfire with Alexis and cornered him inside, shooting him once he ran out of ammunition.
Alexis was shooting people, Comey said, “in a way with no discernible pattern.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.S. clears police officer in Ferguson case, criticizes police force
- Top Senate Republican to states: Ignore EPA carbon rules
- Tsarnaev’s lawyer admits he carried out Boston bombing
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- Expanded background checks pushed again on gun show, Internet purchases
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- More Indian tribes rethink idea of legalized marijuana on reservations
- Nurse who survived Ebola virus says Dallas hospital failed her
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- $4.8M in gold taken in armored truck hijacking in North Carolina
- GOP admits defeat as Congress approves Homeland funding