South Carolina winner of Powerball stays low
LEXINGTON, S.C. — When they learned that a Powerball ticket worth $400 million had been sold at a gas station across the road, workers at Econ-O-Bug Termite and Pest Control said they had a few big, wishful dreams. But they didn't have the prized ticket in their hands, so they came to work as usual on Thursday in their yellow bug-battling vans.
“I sure didn't win it,” said Jason Vannest, 32, of Lexington. He looked wistfully out the window at the buzz of activity at the Murphy USA gas station. “I'd be on vacation if I had, that's for sure.”
Colleague Eddie Terrell chimed in that he had his destination all picked out, even though he wasn't the winner in Wednesday night's drawing of the fourth-largest prize in Powerball history.
“I'd be on a flight to Ireland right now,” said Terrell, 50. He said he purchased his Powerball ticket at another store, but he was still curious. “I just want to know who won it,” he said.
The winner did not attend Thursday's news conference at the gas station, and his or her identity remains a mystery even to lottery officials.
“We have no idea who holds this ticket,” Lottery Executive Director Paula Harper Bethea said. Winners in South Carolina do not have to come forward publicly, she noted.
Bethea advised the winner to sign the back of the ticket, put it in a safe place, and consult financial and legal advice. He or she has 180 days to come forward to lottery officials, she added.
The lucky ticket was one of 356 sold on Wednesday afternoon at the gas station just off Interstate 20 west of Columbia.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Santorum: Obama opposition to fossil fuels ‘quasi-religious’
- Global warming is slowing down the circulation of the oceans — with potentially dire consequences
- Big croc predated dinosaurs, roamed North Carolina region
- Thanks, Dad! Get-well card worth $7M
- Rendell defends role in speeding up visas
- Burgettstown man charged with murder escapes psychiatric hospital
- Storms spawning tornadoes hammer Okla., Ark., killing 1
- Exhibit explores Kahlo, Rivera interplay
- Recordings of women net charges for sailors
- Supreme Court’s health care law ruling worries 34 states
- Privacy and private parts: Nude neighbor exposes law’s limit