Hundreds crossed off missing lists in Colorado flooding
More than a week after heavy flooding cut off communities dotting Colorado mountainsides, searchers have located more than 1,100 people previously listed as unaccounted for and missing.
The 82 people who remained on the list Friday were all from Larimer County in the Rocky Mountain foothills.
Authorities said they could be hermits living alone in the upper reaches of canyons, or people who chose to stay behind and don't know they were reported missing.
As the names on the lists dwindle, the ones that remain are increasingly likely to be people actually missing, injured or dead.
“We recognize that as we start getting down to the nitty-gritty that some of these people are going to be missing and perhaps dead, but until we get everybody out that we're aware of and all of the lists are cross-checked, we're not ready to focus on that yet,” Larimer County sheriff's spokesman John Schulz said.
The lists were compiled primarily from calls from families and evacuees who said they could not locate their loved ones or neighbors. In most cases, those people made contact with their families or authorities to say they were safe.
The number of confirmed deaths stood at seven, with three people missing and presumed dead.
Pinpoint searches were under way of individual homes, vehicles and piles of debris.
In Boulder County, where the number of people unaccounted for had dropped to zero, searchers were scouring isolated areas for people who may not have been on any of the lists.
“I think what we're looking at is those people who maybe were reclusive or lived in the mountains by themselves,” Boulder County sheriff's spokesman Rick Brough said. “They might be the ones we still need to check on, but I don't expect the numbers to be large at all.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Strong rip currents kill 2 men in Ocean City
- Dog gone for 4 months found 3,000 miles from home
- Artificial sweeteners possible contributors to diabetes, obesity
- House panel OKs move to split Amtrak, focus on profitable Northeast Corridor
- FBI, federal marshals join manhunt for survivalist accused of ambushing troopers
- Alaskans get dividend of nearly $1,900 from state’s oil wealth account
- Benghazi panel strives to rise above politics
- Study ties middle-age migraines, Parkinson’s
- Damage assessed from wildfire in Weed, Calif.
- Snowden: U.S. shared info about Americans
- House OKs deal to avert Oct. 1 shutdown, training of Syrian rebels