Naval Yard probe: Worker feud possible
By The Washington Post
Published: Friday, Sept. 20, 2013, 7:36 p.m.
WASHINGTON — The gunman who killed 12 people on Monday at the Washington Navy Yard began his rampage by heading directly to the fourth floor, where he shot people who worked with him, according to law enforcement officials and witness accounts.
Authorities said Friday that they now are investigating whether a workplace issue could have sparked the fatal shootings.
People in the department where Aaron Alexis was working had concerns about his job performance. Investigators are looking into whether those concerns escalated last week, the officials said.
“He was not doing a very good job, and somebody told him that there was a problem,” one law enforcement official said. “Our belief is that the people who were shot first were people he had issues with where he worked, people he had some sort of a dispute with. After that, it became random. .... After the first shootings in that office, he moved around and shot people he came upon. They were then targets of opportunity.”
Alexis, a former Navy reservist who had recent problems with mental illness, was employed by a company contracted to upgrade computers at the Navy Yard.
Workers and law enforcement officials said Alexis worked on the fourth floor, where the shootings began. Although investigators said they don't know the exact order in which the victims were shot, they said the rampage started in an area of people who would have worked with him.
The officials cautioned that they are trying to learn more about the severity of the dispute and whether it was an impetus for the shootings.
The law enforcement officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation is in its early stages. Three of the officials said most of the victims on the fourth floor were shot at close range and in their heads.
Investigators noted that the shootings began on the floor where Alexis worked — not in the open lobby or the top floor where he could have fired down into the atrium below.
“We're attempting to understand as best we can his life up until the moment of that shooting, which would include trying to understand whether there were any issues related to work,” FBI Director James Comey said at a briefing with reporters.
Officials with The Experts, the subcontractor that employed Alexis, declined to comment.
Comey, sworn in as FBI director this month, spoke publicly about the mass shootings for the first time. He said he viewed a surveillance video of parts of the shootings.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Mass. lawmaker takes seat, makes history
- Colo. boy, 6, no longer guilty of ‘sexual harassment’
- Commuter railroad in Bronx crash to undergo federal scrutiny
- New wife pleads guilty in husband’s cliff death
- ‘Affluenza’ not a viable defense in DUI deaths, psychologist says
- Veteran accused oflifting peers’ IDs
- Missing American in Iran was on unapproved CIA mission
- Fawcett bling tops Kelly’s ‘Singin’ in the Rain’ suit
- Bipartisan Senate bill would put kibosh on pricey portraits
- House OKs slashing contractor salary cap nearly in half; Senate likely to follow suit
- GOP makes good on threat to slow confirmations