Embattled IRS official retires before ax falls
WASHINGTON — Lois Lerner, at the center of the Internal Revenue Service scandal, stepped down on Monday as an internal review reportedly called for her removal because of mismanagement.
Lerner headed the Tax Exempt & Government Entities Division at the IRS, which grants tax-exempt status to nonprofit organizations. IRS leaders have acknowledged that the office inappropriately targeted for extra scrutiny groups that had political-sounding names, especially conservative groups.
The IRS confirmed Lerner's retirement but would not comment further, citing federal privacy rules.
Lawmakers said Lerner's resignation occurred as an Accountability Review Board formed by temporary IRS chief Daniel Werfel was set to remove Lerner for mismanagement.
The scandal surfaced when Lerner took a question at a legal conference in May, later revealed to be a planted question, in which she suggested some overzealous IRS employees had used inappropriate criteria to slow down requests for tax-exempt status from conservative groups. Hearings have shown that the Washington headquarters was deeply involved in the process.
Republicans allege that the scrutiny was designed to slow applications from groups who opposed Obama's re-election. California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, who heads the House Committee on Oversight, said on Monday that he still wants testimony from Lerner.
Lerner invoked her Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination when appearing before Issa's committee, but not before offering a defense of her actions, leading Issa to conclude she'd waived her protections.
“Just because Lois Lerner is retiring from the IRS does not mean the investigation is over. Far from it,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Houthis capture at least 4 U.S. citizens
- Nivolumab shines in fighting cancerous lung tumors in immunotherapy regimen
- FBI says lab errors extend to 1999
- Thousands attend B.B. King viewing
- Texas waters yield 4 bodies as death toll climbs; rainfall records fall across state
- Mind was ‘falling apart,’ Colorado theater killing suspect says
- H3N2 dog flu not cause for panic, experts say
- Anthrax shipments underreported
- Legal battle over Brazilian emerald likely at end
- Cuba removed from U.S. terrorism list
- Ginsburg flung open doors for women