E-reader, iPad users who fly may get reprieve for takeoffs, landings
By USA Today
Published: Monday, Sept. 23, 2013, 8:27 p.m.
By next week, the Federal Aviation Administration will find out whether an advisory committee believes it should ease rules that keep fliers from using their e-readers and tablets while a plane is taking off or touching down.
The panel, made up of industry and labor representatives, will meet on Tuesday and Wednesday and is expected by the end of the month to provide a report and recommendations to the FAA on whether rules restricting the use of portable electronics during the start and end of a flight should be loosened.
“The FAA recognizes consumers are intensely interested in the use of personal electronics aboard aircraft,'' the agency said in a statement on Monday. “That is why we tasked a government-industry group to examine the safety issues and the feasibility of changing the current restrictions. ... We will wait for the group to finish its work before we determine next steps.”
The long-standing rules were based on concerns that electronics could affect a jet's guidance and communications systems. But in the digital age, when passengers use portable gadgets to work and while away free time, the warning from flight attendants to turn off all electronics during takeoff and landing has become for some a frustrating ritual.
Several news outlets, including The New York Times, quoted some anonymous panel members saying that the committee will recommend relaxing most of the restrictions.
But if the FAA ultimately changes or relaxes some rules regarding electronics devices, those changes will not lead to the in-flight use of cellphones, which is banned by the Federal Communications Commission.
If the restrictions are eased, “It will result in less contentious relationships between the flight crew and passengers,'' says George Hobica, founder of Airfarewatchdog.com. For “the flight attendants, it's one of the most annoying tasks, to remind people to shut ... devices off.'' And many passengers don't heed the flight attendants' requests.
“On any typical flight, there are dozens of people who put their devices in the overhead bin and didn't shut them down ... or ignore (the warning), and nothing's ever happened,'' Hobica said.
Capt. Sean Cassidy, a pilot for Alaska Airlines, told AFP that he supports the quest for solid science on consumer electronics use in flight.
“We've heard an awful lot of rumors about potential interference, but I think taking a very deliberate data-driven approach is a good thing,” Cassidy said.
He said he has never experienced any technical problems because of passenger devices.
“I have not. Not on the flight deck, and I have thousands and thousands of hours, but of course the other thing to take into account — as a matter of practice and standards — we weren't allowed to have electronic devices turned on and energized while we were flying around.”
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said she was “not breaking out my iPad in celebration just yet. Today's reports are good news only if they're followed by a quick and logical timeline for implementation by the FAA, which I'm hopeful will be the case. This change would make life better for flight crews and passengers alike, and ultimately instill more respect for the important safety rules the traveling public must follow.”
McCaskill has said she is prepared to introduce legislation to change the rules if the FAA doesn't and fails to offer a compelling reason why.
Some industry watchers and experts say that allowing passengers to use their gadgets below 10,000 feet is not a simple decision.
“There's a lot of time where you could be productive between when the door closes and when you climb above 10,000 feet,'' said Brett Snyder, founder of air travel industry blog The Cranky Flier, who said he would welcome the chance to use his gadgets during takeoff and landing. But, “I think it's not a simple decision. ... There's a lot of technology that in theory could interfere with each other, and I don't know anybody who's said there's zero interference ever.''
Dan Macchiarella, professor of aeronautical science at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University's Daytona Beach, Fla., campus, said it may take more than a panel's recommendation to get the FAA to make significant changes to the rules.
“They see their principal purpose as ensuring the safe use of aircraft in the country, and safety of the general public, so they're always cautious,'' he said. “Without legislation, it could take some time.''
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Seafood study: Up to 32 percent imported to U.S. is caught illegally
- ‘Patriots’ back Nevada rancher; Reid labels them ‘domestic terrorists’
- Postal Service overhaul expected to appeal to Dems
- IRS, other agencies award contracts to license plate tracking company
- Ohio couple married for 70 years dies just 15 hours apart
- Health care law enrollee passwords at risk for Heartbleed Internet security flaw, feds warn
- Authorities say they have trove of evidence against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in Boston Marathon bombing
- Obama, House Republicans trade accusations in thwarting immigration reform
- Denver wife killed 12 minutes into 911 call, sparking inquiry
- Wyatt Earp gun sells for $225K at auction
- Fox fires exec who used email to plan aid