Discovery of woman, 79, raises Colo. flood death toll to 8
DENVER — A 79-year-old woman whose house was swept away by the Big Thompson River was found dead on the river bank, authorities said Monday, bringing to eight the death toll from the disastrous flooding in Colorado.
As the number of people who are unaccounted for dwindled to six, Vice President Joe Biden viewed the devastation from a helicopter before meeting with disaster workers.
“I promise you, I promise you, there will be help,” Biden said, trying to mute concerns that a possible federal government shutdown could derail relief efforts.
The latest victim was identified as Evelyn M. Starner. Larimer County authorities said she drowned and suffered blunt-force trauma. Starner had been listed as missing and presumed dead. Authorities initially said she was 80.
Starner was found on Saturday. One other person is still missing and presumed dead — a 60-year-old woman from Larimer County. A man was taken off the list when he walked into the sheriff's office.
The number of unaccounted-for people shrank as improving communications and road access allowed authorities to contact 54 people during the weekend who had not been heard from.
The floods caused damage in 17 counties and across nearly 2,000 square miles. Nearly 2,000 homes were damaged or destroyed, along with more than 200 miles of state highways and 50 state bridges.
The floods are blamed for spills of about 27,000 gallons of oil in northern Colorado oilfields, including two mishaps found during the weekend, the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.