Winner of $400M Powerball jackpot keeps quiet in S.C.
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, Sept. 23, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
COLUMBIA, S.C. — The winner of a $400 million Powerball jackpot cashed in his ticket on Monday, but he told lottery officials that he wants to remain anonymous.
The lottery released a few details about last week's winner, who lives in Columbia.
He stopped to get gas at a Murphy Express gas station in Columbia the day of the drawing last Wednesday, and his wife told him to buy some hot dog buns. The store didn't sell buns, but when he saw the $400 million prize advertised, the winner bought $20 in lottery tickets instead, lottery officials said.
It was only his second time playing the lottery, he told officials.
The winner checked his ticket Thursday at his home and realized he was a winner. He told the only creature around, his dog, according to the South Carolina lottery.
South Carolina is one of only six Powerball states that allow winners to refuse to let their identities to be released. The others are Delaware, Kansas, Maryland, North Dakota and Ohio.
Lottery officials aren't saying whether the man took the $399.4 million payout over 30 years or the direct cash option of $233 million. The jackpot was the fourth largest in the history of the game.
The winning numbers were 7-10-22-32-35, with the Powerball of 19, and were selected by the computer as a “quick-pick.”
State officials said the winner will pay South Carolina about $15 million in taxes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- California man named as bitcoin creator denies involvement
- El Nino could bring relief to U.S.
- Shuster plans oversight for DUI program
- Tenn. homicide suspect shot mom in 2004
- Gas giant’s CEO joins suit related to fracking
- 1st 9/11-related trial in U.S. unfolds
- Experts offer to help Cuba recover artworks
- Ex-magistrate censured in Messiah name change
- Woman hurt in Montana avalanche dies
- D.C. cherry bloom peak forecast for April 8-12
- Massachusetts chemist acted alone in faking test results, report says