NSA workers spied on their loved ones
By The Associated Press
Published: Friday, Sept. 27, 2013, 8:21 p.m.
WASHINGTON — Some workers at the National Security Agency intentionally misused the government's secret surveillance systems at least 12 times over the past decade, including instances when they spied on spouses, boyfriends or girlfriends, according to embarrassing new details disclosed by the agency's inspector general. In nearly every case, the workers were allowed to retire before they could be punished.
In addition to the 12 historical cases, authorities are investigating two other suspected violations and reviewing a third allegation for possible investigation, the inspector general, George Ellard, told Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, in a letter released late Thursday.
Senior national security officials and some lawmakers have said such cases were exceedingly rare considering the breadth of the NSA's surveillance programs and reflect how seriously the government monitors use of its systems for potential abuses.
“Where (a media report) says we're sweeping up the communications of civilians overseas that aren't targets of collection systems is wrong,” the NSA's director, Army Gen. Keith Alexander, told senators Thursday. “If our folks do that, we hold them accountable.”
At least six times the cases were reported to the Justice Department for possible prosecution, Ellard's letter said. In some cases, prosecutors declined to take action but in nearly every case the employees were allowed to retire without punishment. In one case, a worker was suspended without pay then retired; in another case, a worker's promotion was canceled; in two cases, military employees suffered a reduction in rank, extra duty and brief reduction in salary for two months.
Public concerns about how telephone and Internet surveillance data is handled by the NSA have intensified as a result of leaks about the agency's programs by former contract employee Edward Snowden.
With the Senate readying to consider new limits on the NSA's spying programs, national security officials have sought to boost confidence in their procedures. Senior officials have said they moved quickly to report and correct internal problems that led to the NSA's accidental collection of 56,000 emails and other communications by Americans, and they insisted that willful abuse of surveillance data by officials is almost non-existent.
Grassley, who had asked Ellard last month to provide more information about the 12 violations, urged robust oversight of the secret programs.
“We shouldn't tolerate even one misuse of this program,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Seizure of nuns fuels Syrian Christians’ fears
- Mid-Atlantic storm makes driving hazardous
- Gun permit tiff puts officials’ jobs in danger
- Tests could point out less-safe senior drivers
- Municipal limits an issue with concealed-gun law
- U.S. law didn’t halt cigarette flow from New York tribes
- Artist sues Postal Service for using Vegas version of Lady Liberty on forever stamp
- ‘Cannibal sandwiches’ of raw ground beef unsafe, CDC reports
- Subconscious relationship doubts? Trust gut instincts
- United Auto Workers considers first dues hike since 1967
- Dropped frequent flier’s case goes to high court