Search for hikers in Washington slowed by snow
SEATTLE — Search and rescue officials renewed their efforts on Wednesday to find a man and a woman missing in separate, remote parts of southwest Washington after a helicopter rescued two other hikers from waist-deep snow.
Hikers Matt Margiotta and Kyla Arnold were hoisted aboard a Coast Guard helicopter Tuesday evening from the snowy Pacific Crest Trail where it crosses the western flank of 12,280-foot Mount Adams. The helicopter rescue came after a group of ground searchers made it to within less than a mile of the couple, only to be stopped by deep snow and failing daylight.
The helicopter also picked up the five ground searchers, including one who had sprained an ankle, the Coast Guard said.
Two other hikers remained missing Wednesday. One, Kristopher Zitzewitz, was last seen Saturday in the Big Lava Beds area of Gifford Pinchot National Forest, southwest of the mountain. Ground crews resumed searching for him Wednesday morning, said Skamania County Undersheriff Dave Cox, and though there was at least a brief break in the weather it remained unclear whether crews would be able to look by helicopter as well.
Meanwhile, officials were coming up with a game plan for finding Alejandra Wilson, who had also been hiking the Pacific Crest Trail and was believed to be about a day's hike north of where Margiotta and Arnold were found.
Wilson's father, Dane Wilson of Portland, Ore., last heard from her Friday, as she was leaving Trout Lake, a tiny hamlet south of Mount Adams, for White Pass. He reported her overdue when she failed to check in again by Monday, but it wasn't clear whether she needed assistance.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.