Teachers back new Common Core standards in survey
A large majority of K-12 teachers say that new learning standards being implemented in most states will improve students' thinking skills, a new survey suggests.
A poll of more than 20,000 teachers by the children's publisher Scholastic finds that about three-fourths of teachers think the standards known as Common Core will improve students' abilities to reason and think critically. Only 8 percent say Common Core will have a negative impact on the classroom as schools retool to comply with the new standards.
Common Core is designed to replace the nation's patchwork of state standards in math and reading, with goals that emphasize critical thinking and a more thorough understanding of a few key topics.
The National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers in 2009 initiated the effort. All states except for Alaska, Nebraska, Texas and Virginia quickly signed on, helped in part by President Obama, who tied “college and career-ready standards” to billions of dollars in federal grants. Conservatives such as Republican South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley said this made Common Core all but obligatory. Haley last year said the state should not “relinquish control of education to the federal government, neither should we cede it to the consensus of other states.” On the left, education historian Diane Ravitch said the standards weren't adequately field-tested.
Since then, several states, including Michigan, Indiana and Pennsylvania, have put the effort on hold. Last month, Florida Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, said he would withdraw from a national consortium that is creating Common Core tests.
Margery Mayer, Scholastic's president of education, said, “I think that teachers see this as a moment of renewal. They like what the Common Core is asking them to do in the classroom.”
The new survey is underwritten by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which also has supported efforts to implement Common Core.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- $17B emergency funding for Veterans Affairs health care system passes House, heads to Senate
- Charges against Fla. mom raise ire
- IRS calls right-wing Republicans ‘crazies’ in emails
- NYC police unions lose bid in stop-and-frisk case
- House’s vote to sue Obama is historic foray into checks, balances
- N.Y. opera proposes mediation as lockout looms
- Stowaway’s access to Air Force plane eyed
- Senate report to question detention, interrogation practices, secrecy at CIA after 9/11
- Army to begin interrogation of swapped POW
- Rollout of health exchange draws flak from GAO official
- Flat-out ‘miracle’ spares women on railroad span