D.C. visitor ignites himself on National Mall
By The Associated Press
Published: Friday, Oct. 4, 2013, 7:45 p.m.
WASHINGTON — A man who poured a can of gasoline on his head and set himself on fire on the National Mall in the nation's capital has been airlifted to the hospital, police and fire officials said on Friday afternoon.
The man, whose name was not immediately known, suffered life-threatening injuries, D.C. Fire Department spokesman Tim Wilson said.
He was standing by himself at Seventh Street and Madison Drive, in the center portion of the Mall, when he emptied the contents of a red gas can on himself and set himself on fire moments later, said Katy Scheflen, who witnessed it as she walked through the mall.
She said passing joggers took off their shirts in an effort to help douse the flames, and the man was clearly alive as the flames spread. A police department spokesman said he was conscious and breathing at the scene. MedStar Washington Hospital Center tweeted that the man was taken there but had no condition update.
“There was not a lot people could do because it was a gasoline fire,” she said.
She said he may have said something before he acted, “but it was nothing intelligible.” She said she did not see him holding any signs.
“I'm not aware of any signage or any articulation of any causes,” said Lt. Pamela Smith of the U.S. Park Police, which is investigating along with the D.C. police department.
The D.C. Police Department has dispatched its violent crimes branch, which responds to cases in which a person suffers serious injury.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Snowy owls travel south
- FBI: Russian diplomats lied to get U.S. benefits
- From prison to presidency, Mandela reformed South Africa, ended apartheid
- 2 inmates of Gitmo sent home amid fears
- White House flops: Obama knew uncle
- ‘Cannibal sandwiches’ of raw ground beef unsafe, CDC reports
- Budget plans remain in jeopardy
- Georgia cops suspended for cussing out rowdy bus of schoolkids
- United Auto Workers considers first dues hike since 1967
- Sandy Hook 911 calls fuel sensitivity debate
- Arctic front blasts deep into U.S., will shift east