Heads-up on Monday evening! Meteor shower coming
The Draconid meteor shower will sweep across U.S. skies early Monday evening, just after sunset.
Although not among the showiest showers of the year, the Draconids stand out for one reason: Unlike most meteor showers, they are best seen in the evening rather than before dawn.
That makes them a great introduction to sky watching because they don't require getting up early.
The shower this year also should be good watching because the moon is waxing and won't reflect enough light to significantly interfere with the display.
Some Draconids should be visible just after sunset Tuesday evening, but that display is not expected to be as large.
Last year's Draconid shower was especially lively, which means this year the meteors are likely to be a little more sedate, according to EarthSky, a science news blog.
The name comes from the way the meteors appear to emanate from the northern constellation Draco the Dragon, which sits just above the Little Dipper in the night sky.
The meteors are the result of tiny bits of dust and ice debris left behind by the Giacobini-Zinner comet, which circles the sun every 6.6 years.
As the Earth passes through the trail of cosmic debris, the particles burn up in our atmosphere, creating the fiery trails we call falling stars.
The Draconids are notoriously unpredictable. Some years they are impressive, with thousands of falling stars per hour, and other years they are much more sedate. Showers in 1933 and 1946 were especially large.
To get the best view, find an area away from city lights so the eyes can adjust to the darkness for at least 20 minutes. Astronomers suggest lying on a blanket or reclining chair to get a full-sky view.
“If you can see all of the stars in the Little Dipper, you have good dark-adapted vision,” said Rebecca Johnson, editor of StarDate magazine.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Doctor 1st Ebola virus case in New York City
- Fight against Islamic State at impasse, military commanders say
- Feds fault security of tax info gathered for health care law benefits
- West Virginia University expels 3 students for postgame misconduct
- Huge gold nugget goes on sale for $400K
- Man shot from behind, Wecht’s autopsy finds
- Driver accused of pretending to be Ohio cop
- Missouri officials faulted by feds for ‘selective’ probe in police shooting death
- Scientists unravel genetics of height
- Sen. Casey seeks to cut off benefits to ex-Nazis
- Court: IRS not targeting conservative tax-exempt groups