Study: 1 in 10 youths have perpetrated sex violence
Nearly 1 in 10 young people report being a perpetrator of sexual violence — either coercing or forcing some type of sexual contact upon another, according to a national study that suggests a connection between such behaviors and being exposed to violent X-rated material.
The research, published online Monday in the journal JAMA Pediatrics, is based on data from 1,058 young people ages 14-21 collected in 2010 and 2011 by the Center for Innovative Public Health Research, a nonprofit organization based in San Clemente, Calif. About half the participants, 53 percent, were ages 18-21 and 47 percent were ages 14-17.
“Sexual violence can be perpetrated by anybody – a dating partner, a friend or somebody you don't know,” said Michele Ybarra, the center's president and director of research. “We asked perpetrators about their relationship with their most recent victims, and one in four said it was not a dating partner.”
Ybarra says the study is important because most research about sexual violence has focused only on dating partners and on college-age individuals who don't require parental consent.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Man caught jumping White House fence
- Coast Guard to seek billions to protect Arctic interests
- 4 private security guards convicted
- Ferguson slaying of Brown reconstructed in county autopsy
- Academic scandal at University of North Carolina bigger than previously reported
- Coburn’s final ‘Wastebook’ tallies $25B in what he considers ‘pork’
- Navy civilian goes on trial for diverting $2M to brother of his boss
- Social Security recipients to get increase in benefits
- Personal use of Secret Service agents on staffer’s behalf draws investigaton
- Security at Capitol questioned
- 8 arrested in post-game riots in Morgantown