Slow start forecast for winter in East
Snow lovers in the Eastern United States may have to wait until February to see much of the white stuff, according to the winter forecast released on Wednesday by private forecasting firm AccuWeather.
At the same time, most of the West will get smacked with the opposite weather pattern: a cold and snowy start — which could be good news for drought-plagued California — followed by a warmer end to the winter. Meanwhile, the north-central states should slog through a typically cold and stormy season.
After a couple of shots of chilly air in November, “we should see temperatures in December some 3-4 degrees above average in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic,” AccuWeather meteorologist Jack Boston said.
Most of January should be a bit warmer than average, he said, before the weather turns frigid and snowy in February. Boston predicted that February will be favorable for big snowstorms and nor'easters along the East Coast.
Philadelphia, for instance, which received only 8 inches of snow last year, will likely get higher amounts, AccuWeather predicted.
The Southeast and Gulf Coast will be warmer than average, Boston said, with some spots in the Tennessee Valley experiencing record-breaking warmth in December. However, along with the mild temperatures, there will be a threat for a few bouts of severe storms and the chance of tornadoes.
Winter has paid an unwelcome early visit in South Dakota, where parts of the state were buried under as much as four feet of snow last week. This is likely a preview of coming attractions, as AccuWeather expects strong systems to dump above-average amounts of snow. The Northwest and northern Rockies should expect plenty of cold and snow.
California should enjoy some drought relief in December and January, thanks to a prediction of heavy rain and snow.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.