Wind, solar patents do about-face as renewable energy eclipses fossil fuels
Innovation in solar, wind and other renewable power is booming worldwide, especially in China, and is eclipsing that in fossil fuels — an about-face that occurred in only one generation, new research shows.
In the United States alone, the number of renewable energy patents exceeded 1,000 annually by 2009 — up from fewer than 200 per year in the 1975-2000 period. In contrast, patents for coal, oil or gas technologies rose to about 300 in 2009, up from 100 annually in earlier decades.
Study co-author Jessika Trancik, an engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, attributes the increase to research funding and market demand.
Worldwide, the number of wind patents increased 19 percent annually and solar ones 13 percent each year between 2004 and 2009, according to the study. Japan has the most cumulative solar patents, followed by the United States and China, but China is obtaining more of these patents than any other country in recent years.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Supreme Court will hear challenge to EPA’s power-plant rules
- 2 FBI agents shot, wounded in St. Louis area
- Brown family blasts prosecutor; Wilson speaks
- In IRS ‘rife with scandal,’ staff to receive bonuses
- Ferguson grand jury focused on fatal ‘tussle’
- United Mine Workers responds to strike complaint
- Premiums to rise for Obamacare’s most popular plans
- Illegals protected by Obama in line for Social Security, Medicare, other benefits
- Mo. governor adds guardsmen as protests continue
- EPA eyes stringent air quality standards
- ‘Sex purchasers’ publicly shamed