Health exchanges use paper forms to start insurance enrollments as websites fail
By The Washington Post
Published: Saturday, Oct. 12, 2013, 6:45 p.m.
The dead-tree version of health insurance enrollment is turning out to be popular, but processing paper is likely to add to delays and will further complicate a process that was supposed to be one-stop shopping, experts say.
Unable to use new government insurance websites plagued by technological problems, those tasked with helping the uninsured sign up are bypassing them, relying instead on old-fashioned paper applications.
It is a slow and labor-intensive substitute for what was supposed to be a snappy online application, similar to Amazon or Travelocity.
“These are low- to moderate-income people, stopping by on their lunch break, between picking up their kids. They don't have time to mess with a website that doesn't work,” said Marie Hurt, executive director of Southern United Neighborhood, a New Orleans-based charity that is helping people enroll in coverage in three states.
She is encouraging people who stop by her center, inside a church, to avoid the federal website for now and use the paper enrollment form.
Timothy S. Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University who specializes in health policy, said filling out paper applications does give people the sense that the “process is under way,” he said. But he added: “It will add to delay. It will add to errors.”
Paper may give people the impression that something is happening when an online system isn't functioning properly. In fact, that's not the case, said Kevin Counihan, executive director of the Connecticut exchange, Access Health CT.
Personnel reviewing paper applications need to manually type data from paper into the same Web-based marketplaces that consumers are using. Reviewers are entering through a different “portal” than one consumers use. But it's the same online system.
“If you don't have a working [online] system, paper doesn't do you any good. It's almost worse because there's this illusion that you've finished something,” Counihan said. “When in fact, it's just getting stacked up waiting for the system to work.”
The paper process is clunky and prone to errors. And it provides “a substandard user experience,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- FBI’s elite surveillance team trying to find ‘Mo’
- Wind-power companies won’t face federal prosecution in eagle deaths
- Survivors honor Pearl Harbor’s heroes
- Boy has emergency, dies on flight to visit family
- GOP unlikely to block ban on plastic guns
- Feds curtail paper applications for health care law
- Former top Obama aide to work on health law
- Suspense builds for pipeline report
- Deported vet glad he’s back in states
- Train hurtling almost 3 times speed limit