Death tallies belie impact of kids' gun injuries
Gunshot-related injuries are well-known as a leading cause of death among children and adolescents, but other aspects of the health toll they inflict get much less attention, including injury severity, the need for major surgical intervention and high care costs, a study said.
The burden of these adverse outcomes is particularly common for older adolescent males (ages 15 to 19), who accounted for the majority (83.2 percent) of children who suffered gunshot injuries in the study reported in November's Pediatrics, published online on Monday.
The study provides “a broader look” at the disproportionate and negative effects beyond fatalities that are associated with firearm use, said emergency medicine physician Craig Newgard, lead study author.
“If we focus on just fatalities, we're only looking at the tip of the iceberg,” said Newgard, associate professor and director of the Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine at the Oregon Health & Science University in Portland.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, gunshot injuries rank second only to motor vehicle crashes as a cause of death for children ages 15 to 19. From 2001 to 2010, 29,331 children months old to 19 died of gunshot-related injuries; another 155,000 were injured seriously enough to undergo treatment in emergency departments.
In the study, researchers analyzed data collected during three years on 49,983 kids and teenagers evaluated by emergency medical service agencies transporting to 93 hospitals in five regions of the West — Portland, Ore./Vancouver, Wash. (four counties); King County, Wash.; Sacramento (two counties); Santa Clara, Calif. (two counties); and Denver County, Colo.
Gunshot wounds accounted for just 1 percent of injured children but were associated with 21 percent of deaths after injury.
Although the rate of gunshot-related injuries (8 per 100,000 children) was “relatively small” compared with six other causes of injuries studied (including cuts, falls and motor vehicle crashes), they had dramatically higher adverse outcomes.
Specifically, children wounded by gunshots had the highest proportion of serious injuries (23 percent), major surgeries (32 percent) and deaths in hospitals (8 percent), along with the highest acute care costs, $28,510 per patient. The next-highest care costs, $15,566, were for injuries sustained from being struck by a motor vehicle.
“In every metric that we looked at, the front-runner far and away for worst outcome and greatest impact was gunshot-related injuries,” said Newgard.
Given that the data used represents just five regions of the western part of the country, the findings likely underestimate the national picture, he said.
Overall, “The study highlights the highly lethal nature of firearm-related injuries among children,” says Patrick Carter, an emergency physician and injury researcher at the University of Michigan Injury Center in Ann Arbor. Carter was not involved in the study.
It reinforces the need for research into effective approaches to reduce individual and environmental risk factors along with effective public health interventions, Carter said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Cause of New Mexico nuclear-waste accident remains a mystery
- Issa demands Labor records that he says show government waste
- Wis. woman identified shooter before dying, court papers show
- Conn. expert set to guide Obamacare exchanges
- Police: Drugs, alcohol not factors in Freeh crash
- Powerful GOP leaders linked to tax-avoidance
- Teen gets 5-15 years for killing 4 friends in 100-mph crash
- Audio of Mo. shooting emerges, said to be authentic
- Veterans promised policy changes for better health
- Study: Facebook, Twitter stifle discourse on hot-button issues
- Legal experts back business push for immigration changes