NEW YORK — Five former employees of imprisoned financier Bernard Madoff enriched themselves and helped “perpetuate Madoff's elaborate fiction” by weaving an elaborate web of lies that for decades duped investors and government regulators, a prosecutor said on Wednesday as the workers' criminal trial began.
“These are the people who helped him do it,” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew Schwartz, pointing at each defendant in federal court. “Bernie Madoff needed help to fool so many people for so long. ... A fraud of this scope and duration could not have been carried out alone.”
Later, he added: “For year after year after year, they lied for the most simple reason — greed.”
The remarks were made during opening statements at a trial that's expected to last five months and showcase testimony of Frank DiPascali, Madoff's former finance chief, and five other insiders who pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate in the case. Defense attorneys were expected to give their opening statements on Thursday.
The defendants — Annette Bongiorno, Madoff's longtime secretary; Daniel Bonventre, his director of operations for investments; JoAnn Crupi, an account manager; and computer programmers Jerome O'Hara and George Perez — all have pleaded not guilty. They claim they were led astray by Madoff and in the dark about his epic fraud.
The trial is the first to result from the 2008 collapse of Madoff's private investment business, which cost clients nearly $20 billion. A court-appointed trustee has recovered much of the money by forcing those customers who received big payouts from Madoff to return the funds. When the fraud was revealed, Madoff admitted the nearly $68 billion he claimed existed in accounts was actually only a few hundred million dollars.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.