Dems criticize flawed rollout of health care law
WASHINGTON — Republicans have always been harsh critics of Obamacare.
Now President Obama's signature health care law is taking heat from Democrats, too. More than three weeks after the problem-plagued rollout of the federal marketplace where consumers can sign up for health insurance, support for major provisions of the Affordable Care Act is weakening among some Democrats, who want to see someone fired over the botched debut.
“I absolutely believe that somebody should be held accountable,” said Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., chairman of the House Democratic Caucus.
As lawmakers prepare to grill federal contractors on Thursday about the performance of the Healthcare.gov website at a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing, the marketplace has grown from a public relations black eye into the most immediate threat to the law's early success.
Wednesday was the first full day the House of Representatives had met since controversy erupted over the insurance marketplaces, and the political fallout was everywhere. Republicans paraded one by one onto the House floor offering one-minute speeches blasting the law. House Democrats met and expressed frustration.
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire broke with fellow Democrats and called on Obama to extend the open enrollment period beyond March 31, 2014. In a letter to Obama, Shaheen said the website problems are “incredibly frustrating and disappointing.”
Up to five Democrat senators were discussing introducing legislation to delay implementation of the law for up to a year.
Even the chairwoman of the Democratic Party, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, embraced Shaheen's idea, telling MSNBC, “There should absolutely be an openness to extending the open enrollment period. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.”
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., shot down Shaheen's proposal at her weekly news conference.
“I don't support that,” Pelosi said, adding that the state-run California insurance marketplace is working well. “So I think we should try to fix what we have, move forward with the deadline we have, respectful of what her experience may be and her suggestion, but not (be) supportive of it.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- VA nominee to demand ‘urgent action,’ he tells panel
- To fight crime, Chicago tries wiping away arrests
- HGH use on the rise in teens, survey finds
- ‘Slenderman’ attack victim receives Purple Heart from anonymous well wisher
- Explosion levels home in Central Texas; 3 hurt
- Montana judge censured over rape case comments
- For more than 8 decades, N.Y. farmer has kept eye to the sky
- Cyber domain is next battleground, authors of 9/11 report warn
- Autistic twin men locked up in Maryland home
- Man convicted of enslaving woman gets 30 years
- Beef industry’s environmental footprint bigger than pork, poultry, eggs, dairy, study finds