Family finds stranger's body in casket
CHEHALIS, Wash. — The family of Jerry Moon wants to know how the wrong body ended up in his casket at his Washington state funeral.
Family members were horrified on Monday when they looked in the casket and saw the body of another man, The Chronicle reported on Tuesday. They hired a lawyer and asked the state Department of Licensing to investigate.
Moon, a retired railroad conductor from Castle Rock, died on Oct. 13 in Community Home, Health & Hospice in Longview at 72. Dahl McVicker Funeral Home in Kelso picked up his body the same day, and Brown Mortuary in Chehalis transported the body from there a day later.
Brown Mortuary manager Daniel LaPlaunt said the bodies of the two men were mislabeled at the Kelso funeral home. His company has changed its policy to require family identification before any services in hopes of avoiding similar problems in the future.
LaPlaunt was reluctant to blame the Kelso home and said he was speaking in hopes of countering incorrect information in news reports.
Ken Dahl, president of Dahl McVicker Funeral Home, would not comment on the case.
“In the interest of protecting the privacy of the family we're serving, we've been asked not to discuss this with anybody,” Dahl told The Associated Press.
Moon's son, Brian Moon of Chehalis, said he learned from Dahl when the mix-up was discovered that his dad had been cremated.
“My dad feared cremation and didn't want any part of it,” Moon said. “He spent a lot of time and money, and he wanted to be buried next to his father and mother.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.