Money trail leads to fines for PACs
SACRAMENTO — In a case seeking to unmask the murky multimillion-dollar trail of money pouring into state and national political campaigns, California's political watchdog agency on Thursday announced the largest fine in its history for campaign reporting violations and ordered two political action committees to pay the state $15 million for failing to properly report the source of funds spent in the 2012 election.
Teams of attorneys and researchers from two state agencies spent a year tracing the money used to oppose one California ballot initiative and support another, illustrating how difficult it has become to track the flow of money in state and national political campaigns. The groups that helped funnel the money were in numerous states, including Arizona, Iowa and Virginia.
The California Fair Political Practices Commission called the two groups that will pay the $1 million fine “part of the ‘Koch Brothers Network' of dark money political nonprofit corporations.” The reference is to billionaire brothers Charles and David H. Koch, who have given millions to conservative causes across the country.
The $15 million in payments ordered to California's general fund stem from separate out-of-state contributions last fall that drew scrutiny from state regulators:
• $11 million that the Laguna Niguel-based Small Business Action Committee received from a nonprofit based in Phoenix called Americans for Responsible Leadership, which received the money from another Phoenix-based nonprofit, the Koch-backed Center to Protect Patient Rights. That group did not report the contribution.
• $4 million that went to the Iowa-based California Future Fund for Free Markets Yes on Proposition 32 through the American Future Fund, which received the money from the Center to Protect Patient Rights. That money also was not reported to the state.
In the settlement between the state and the nonprofits, to be filed in Sacramento County Superior Court, Americans for Responsible Leadership and the Center to Protect Patient Rights each agreed to pay a $500,000 fine.
The state's investigation began with the $11 million contribution last fall to a California group that was fighting Gov. Jerry Brown's November ballot initiative to raise taxes and supporting another one to limit the power of unions. Voters ultimately approved Brown's tax increase and rejected the limits on unions.
The state watchdog agency said the two groups that received the money and led the campaigns in California are required to make their respective $11 million and $4 million payments to the state general fund as a result of the settlement.
But Steve Churchwell, an attorney for the Small Business Action Committee, disputed that. He told The Associated Press that the group has no intention of paying the $11 million because the law applies only to candidate elections and not ballot initiatives.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slow-moving, wintry storm packs punch in Plains, Midwest
- Police union stands by Chicago officer charged with murdering teen
- Investors buy shares in college students: Purdue University thinks it’s wave of future
- Police officer killed in Colorado Spring clinic rampage a co-pastor, figure skater
- Colorado clinic shooting suspect talked of baby parts, police say
- Federal $1.1 trillion spending bill loaded with policy deals
- Authorization for NSA dragnets of phone call data expires
- Prof proposes museum of corruption in New York capital
- Artists plan to rebuild Alaska art display damaged by tides
- Disability claim waits grow alongside swelling caseloads for judges
- Pot doctors in medical marijuana states push boundaries with marketing