FDA supports tighter restrictions on hydrocodone
WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration is recommending tighter restrictions on prescription medicines containing hydrocodone, the highly addictive painkiller that has grown into the most widely prescribed drug in the United States.
In a major policy shift, the agency said in an online notice on Thursday that hydrocodone-containing drugs should be subject to the same restrictions as other narcotic drugs such as oxycodone and morphine.
More than a decade has passed since the Drug Enforcement Agency asked the FDA to reclassify hydrocodone so that it would be subject to the same restrictions as other opioid drugs. The FDA did not issue a formal announcement about its decision, which has long been sought by many patient advocates, doctors and lawmakers.
In early December, the FDA says it will formally request that hydrocodone be classified as a Schedule II drug, limiting who can write a prescription and how many times it can be refilled.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Oregon mulls law limiting antibiotic use on livestock
- Buffalo weighs public boarding school proposals for at-risk kids
- Federal highway fund shortage batters states
- 3 found dead in California tire shop fire
- Maybe Manhattan coyote just wanted a good mocha latte
- AG misled Congress on spying dispute, Bush-era report says
- Experts met in Nepal week ago to discuss earthquake they knew would rip into Kathmandu
- Study a surprise: Commercial bees unfazed by pesticides
- Baltimore resident’s death in police custody draws hundreds in protests
- Federal appeals court appears divided on Obama’s immigrant deportation shield
- Sen. Sanders slows down “fast-track” trade bill