Share This Page

Bishop may have exposed parishioners to hepatitis

| Friday, Oct. 25, 2013, 6:24 p.m.

Catholics in North Dakota have been warned to watch for symptoms of hepatitis A because a bishop unknowingly had the disease and served Communion, state officials said.

Bishop John Folda of the Catholic Diocese of Fargo contracted hepatitis from contaminated food while in Italy last month for a conference of newly ordained bishops, said Aliceyn Magelky, spokeswoman for the diocese.

Folda served communion during Mass at three churches in Fargo and one church in Jamestown between Sept. 27 and Oct. 7, according to a statement on Thursday from the North Dakota Department of Health.

The Mass in Jamestown was at a convention of priests.

“He feels terrible about it,” Magelky said. “He did not know when coming back that he had contracted the virus or he would have refrained from participating in Mass much sooner.”

Magelky said Folda is feeling better and has not been infectious since Oct. 16.

Hepatitis A, which can cause infection of the liver, is most often spread when people fail to wash their hands thoroughly and then touch other people.

The department encouraged people who received communion from Folda to check with their doctors if they notice symptoms such as fever, tiredness, loss of appetite or jaundice.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.