White House shifts course on health care, tries to keep Democrats on board
By the time President Obama acknowledged on Monday that his signature health-care program had serious problems, it was clear the political stakes had escalated for the White House.
And so that evening, Obama gathered some of his top political advisers from his first term for a strategy session. The president himself spent little time on how to handle the political fallout, arguing that fixing the problems of HealthCare.gov would take care of that challenge.
Not everyone agreed it was so simple.
In a separate huddle that night, without the president, some of those former aides — including David Plouffe, Robert Gibbs and David Axelrod of the president's original political brain trust — advanced a different argument to deal with what some of them saw as a looming threat.
Comparing the experience to the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, they warned senior staffers that they needed a strategy shift — one that involved providing as much information as possible to Capitol Hill and the media — or risk defections by crucial Democrats facing re-election in 2014. Keeping allies on board was critical to saving the broader program, so maintaining Democratic cohesion represented a key first step.
By the end of the week, the administration had shifted its approach, opening up about details of the problems and holding regular news briefings in which officials identified a deadline for fixing the website. They delivered private briefings to Senate staffers and House members, while White House chief of staff Denis McDonough called key senators to update them.
The belated turnabout underscored how the White House — which spent the first two weeks of the rollout focused on reopening the government and averting a debt ceiling crisis and a third week trying to deflect questions as it enlisted help to fix the system — has been forced to scramble to fend off a back-door assault from Democrats on the president's signature legislative achievement. With sparse information about the website's problems at the outset, senior administration officials are working to repair fissures in the party.
“The stakes are high because of the politics of it,” said Rep. Gerald E. Connolly, D-Va., a White House ally who has criticized the contracting process. “I think the White House understands that it's important to have transparency, so we're not unnecessarily eroding confidence in the program.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Carnegie Mellon expert to school Congress on security
- Tribune-Review poll: Cable news rises as network news falls
- Lawmakers press Veterans Affairs for improved access to rural health care
- Several states in path of wintry blasts
- Natural gas royalties lawsuit hinges on transaction date
- Monarch butterflies find milkweed supply dwindles
- EPA ripped for evading request for information
- Devoted California couple dies within 5 hours of each other
- Dems keep blocking joint negotiations on immigration orders
- $4.8M in gold taken in armored truck hijacking in North Carolina
- Homeland Security panned for passing on bio-threat technology