Sharpton threatens to boycott luxury retailer Barneys over racial profiling of shoppers
NEW YORK — The Rev. Al Sharpton threatened on Saturday to boycott luxury retailer Barneys if the store does not respond adequately to allegations by black shoppers that they were racially profiled.
“We've gone from stop-and-frisk to shop-and-frisk, and we are not going to take it,” the black civil rights leader said. “We are not going to live in a town where our money is considered suspect and everyone else's money is respected.”
Two black customers of Barneys in New York, Trayon Christian and Kayla Phillips, said last week that they were detained by police after making expensive purchases.
Christian sued Barneys, saying he was accused of fraud for using his debit card to buy a $349 Ferragamo belt in April.
Barneys said on Thursday that it had retained a civil rights expert to help review its procedures.
The CEO of Barneys, Mark Lee, offered his “sincere regret and deepest apologies.”
Kirsten John Foy, an official with Sharpton's National Action Network, said he would meet with Barneys officials on Tuesday to discuss the racial profiling allegations.
“The only theft that took place at Barneys was Barneys' stealing the dignity of these young people,” said Foy, who joined Sharpton at his weekly rally at the organization's Harlem headquarters.
Sharpton said black New Yorkers should put shopping at Barneys “on hold” if the retailer's response is inadequate.
The profiling claims also incited criticism on Twitter and an online petition asking rapper Jay-Z, who is collaborating with the luxury retailer for a holiday collection, to disassociate from it.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.